Abstract

BackgroundTo analyze the influence of inferior vena cava (IVC) interruption for perioperative and oncological results in patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus and summarize the surgical strategies of IVC interruption for different situations.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological data of 103 patients in our center. Patients were divided into two groups with 32 cases (31.1%) underwent IVC interruption (Group 1) while 71 cases (68.9%) did not. For comparison of continuous variables, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. For comparison of categorical variables, Chi-square tests were used. A propensity score based matching method was used to eliminate possible bias. Kaplan–Meier plots were performed to evaluate the influence of IVC interruption on overall survival and cancer specific survival. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsAmong the 32 patients who underwent IVC interruption, the median age was 61 years and the median tumor size was 7.7 cm. There were 28 males and 23 tumors were on the right side. We successfully matched 29 patients who underwent IVC interruption to 29 patients without this procedure in 1:1 ratio. No significant differences existed in baseline characteristics between the groups. The comparison of perioperative data showed that patients who underwent IVC interruption had significantly longer median postoperative hospital stays (13 vs 9 days, P = 0.022) and a higher overall postoperative complication rate (79.3 vs 51.7%, P = 0.027). According to the side and shape of tumor thrombus, it could be divided into four categories. There were 15 cases (46.9%) with right filled-type tumor thrombus (RFTT), 8 cases (25.0%) with right non-filled-type tumor thrombus (RNFTT), 1 case (3.1%) with left filled-type tumor thrombus (LFTT) and 8 cases (25.0%) with left non-filled-type tumor thrombus (LNFTT). According to different categories, different surgical procedures were adopted.ConclusionsIVC interruption will increase the incidence of overall postoperative complications, but not the risk of major postoperative complications. Tumor thrombus should be divided into four categories, and different sides and shapes of renal tumor thrombus need different operative procedure of IVC interruption.

Highlights

  • To analyze the influence of inferior vena cava (IVC) interruption for perioperative and oncological results in patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus and summarize the surgical strategies of IVC interruption for different situations

  • To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus who underwent IVC interruption and to explore the effect of different sides and shapes of renal tumor thrombus on the surgical procedure of IVC interruption, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 103 patients with renal cell carcinoma and IVC tumor thrombus from January 2014 to March 2019 who received IVC interruption during surgical treatment in our center

  • According to the side and shape of renal tumor thrombus, it could be divided into four categories: right filled-type tumor thrombus (RFTT), right non-filledtype tumor thrombus (RNFTT), left filled-type tumor thrombus (LFTT), left non-filled-type tumor thrombus (LNFTT)

Read more

Summary

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological data of 103 patients in our center. Patients were divided into two groups with 32 cases (31.1%) underwent IVC interruption (Group 1) while 71 cases (68.9%) did not. For comparison of continuous variables, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. For comparison of categorical variables, Chi-square tests were used. A propensity score based matching method was used to eliminate possible bias. Kaplan– Meier plots were performed to evaluate the influence of IVC interruption on overall survival and cancer specific survival. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.