Abstract

The inference of physical parameters from measured distributions constitutes a core task in physics data analyses. Among recent deep learning methods, so-called conditional invertible neural networks provide an elegant approach owing to their probability-preserving bijective mapping properties. They enable training the parameter-observation correspondence in one mapping direction and evaluating the parameter posterior distributions in the reverse direction. Here, we study the inference of cosmic-ray source properties from cosmic-ray observations on Earth using extensive astrophysical simulations. We compare the performance of conditional invertible neural networks (cINNs) with the frequently used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. While cINNs are trained to directly predict the parameters’ posterior distributions, the MCMC method extracts the posterior distributions through a likelihood function that matches simulations with observations. Overall, we find good agreement between the physics parameters derived by the two different methods. As a result of its computational efficiency, the cINN method allows for a swift assessment of inference quality.

Highlights

  • Among recent deep learning methods, so-called conditional invertible neural networks provide an elegant approach owing to their probability-preserving bijective mapping properties

  • We compare the performance of conditional invertible neural networks with the frequently used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method

  • While conditional invertible neural networks (cINNs) are trained to directly predict the parameters’ posterior distributions, the MCMC method extracts the posterior distributions through a likelihood function that matches simulations with observations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Information about our universe is obtained from four different messengers: electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, neutrinos, and gravitational waves. To obtain dedicated information about properties of the universe, e.g., the source of the messenger, the influences of the other contributions (propagation, detector effects) have to be reversed by mathematical methods This process is usually referred to as inference. Instead of the complete true energy distribution at the source, we aim to determine a set of characteristic quantities at the source, describing the set of different atomic nuclei (composition), the power of the energy spectrum (spectral index), and the maximum accelerator energy This astrophysical scenario is kept very simple, but already shows the sensitivity of the measurements to source properties of cosmic rays [3]. We present a normalizing flow network for the determination of cosmic-ray source parameters from measured distributions The quality of this so-called conditional invertible neural network (cINN) is investigated in a comparative study with the traditional MCMC method.

Astrophysical scenario and database
MCMC method for inference
Architecture of a cINN
Training and loss function
Stability of the cINN results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.