Abstract

ABSTRACTSmall noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) are key regulators of bacterial gene expression. Through complementary base pairing, sRNAs affect mRNA stability and translation efficiency. Here, we describe a network inference approach designed to identify sRNA-mediated regulation of transcript levels. We use existing transcriptional data sets and prior knowledge to infer sRNA regulons using our network inference tool, the Inferelator. This approach produces genome-wide gene regulatory networks that include contributions by both transcription factors and sRNAs. We show the benefits of estimating and incorporating sRNA activities into network inference pipelines using available experimental data. We also demonstrate how these estimated sRNA regulatory activities can be mined to identify the experimental conditions where sRNAs are most active. We uncover 45 novel experimentally supported sRNA-mRNA interactions in Escherichia coli, outperforming previous network-based efforts. Additionally, our pipeline complements sequence-based sRNA-mRNA interaction prediction methods by adding a data-driven filtering step. Finally, we show the general applicability of our approach by identifying 24 novel, experimentally supported, sRNA-mRNA interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis. Overall, our strategy generates novel insights into the functional context of sRNA regulation in multiple bacterial species.IMPORTANCE Individual bacterial genomes can have dozens of small noncoding RNAs with largely unexplored regulatory functions. Although bacterial sRNAs influence a wide range of biological processes, including antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity, our current understanding of sRNA-mediated regulation is far from complete. Most of the available information is restricted to a few well-studied bacterial species; and even in those species, only partial sets of sRNA targets have been characterized in detail. To close this information gap, we developed a computational strategy that takes advantage of available transcriptional data and knowledge about validated and putative sRNA-mRNA interactions for inferring expanded sRNA regulons. Our approach facilitates the identification of experimentally supported novel interactions while filtering out false-positive results. Due to its data-driven nature, our method prioritizes biologically relevant interactions among lists of candidate sRNA-target pairs predicted in silico from sequence analysis or derived from sRNA-mRNA binding experiments.

Highlights

  • Small noncoding RNAs are key regulators of bacterial gene expression

  • We address the complexity of sRNA-mediated regulation by estimating sRNA regulatory activities to generate models of gene regulation for four bacterial species

  • The initial analysis was restricted to eight E. coli sRNAs with several experimentally supported targets (Table 1) and expanded to B. subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) are key regulators of bacterial gene expression. Through complementary base pairing, sRNAs affect mRNA stability and translation efficiency. Most of the available information is restricted to a few well-studied bacterial species; and even in those species, only partial sets of sRNA targets have been characterized in detail To close this information gap, we developed a computational strategy that takes advantage of available transcriptional data and knowledge about validated and putative sRNA-mRNA interactions for inferring expanded sRNA regulons. Network inference methods have been implemented to study sRNA-mediated regulation and map E. coli sRNA regulatory networks using transcriptional profiles of sRNAs and their putative target genes These strategies rely either on context likelihood of relatedness (CLR) or exploit gene coregulation; the recall of known sRNA-mRNA interactions is limited, and the accuracy of novel predictions is not systematically evaluated [13,14,15]. The regulatory contribution of sRNAs becomes inconsequential when the concentration of their targets significantly exceeds their own concentration [18, 19]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call