Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) comprise the oncogenic human γ-herpesvirus family and are responsible for 2-3% of all tumours in man. With their prominent growth-transforming abilities and high prevalence in the human population, these pathogens have probably shaped the human immune system throughout evolution for near perfect immune control of the respective chronic infections in the vast majority of healthy pathogen carriers. The exclusive tropism of EBV and KSHV for humans has, however, made it difficult in the past to study their infection, tumourigenesis and immune control in vivo. Mice with reconstituted human immune system components (humanized mice) support replication of both viruses with both persisting latent and productive lytic infection. Moreover, B-cell lymphomas can be induced by EBV alone and KSHV co-infection with gene expression hallmarks of human malignancies that are associated with both viruses. Furthermore, cell-mediated immune control by primarily cytotoxic lymphocytes is induced upon infection and can be probed for its functional characteristics as well as putative requirements for its priming. Insights that have been gained from this model and remaining questions will be discussed in this review. This article is part of the theme issue 'Silent cancer agents: multi-disciplinary modelling of human DNA oncoviruses'.

Highlights

  • The two human g-herpesviruses Epstein –Barr virus (EBV or HHV4) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8) are among the seven viruses that the World Health Organization has classified as class I carcinogens (besides human papilloma virus (HPV), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), hepatitis B and C viruses and human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)) [1,2,3]

  • Cognate antigen recognition by the B-cell receptor and ensuing plasma cell differentiation are thought to trigger lytic EBV replication [15]. These premalignant states of oncogenic EBV gene expression programmes are seemingly kept in check by immune control, which will be discussed in further detail below

  • It has been reported that the inhibition of lytic herpesvirus replication was able to prevent KS in patients and has been used to treat individual primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cases [19,67 –70]. These studies suggest that humanized mice develop B-cell lymphomas after EBV single or co-infection with KSHV with similarities to the respective human hematologic malignancies, and that lytic EBV replication contributes to tumour formation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The two human g-herpesviruses Epstein –Barr virus (EBV or HHV4) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8) are among the seven viruses that the World Health Organization has classified as class I carcinogens (besides human papilloma virus (HPV), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), hepatitis B and C viruses and human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)) [1,2,3]. Infection with EBNA3A and 3C-deficient viruses was restricted to secondary lymphoid tissues and persisted for at least three months At this time point, primarily non-translated EBV RNA without latent protein expression could be detected in EBV-infected B cells. It has been reported that the inhibition of lytic herpesvirus replication was able to prevent KS in patients and has been used to treat individual PEL cases [19,67 –70] These studies suggest that humanized mice develop B-cell lymphomas after EBV single or co-infection with KSHV with similarities to the respective human hematologic malignancies, and that lytic EBV replication contributes to tumour formation. The tumour microenvironment that is most likely stimulated by lytic reactivation significantly contributes to the robustness of EBV-associated malignancy development Along these lines, it was reported that LMP1-deficient EBV can cause lymphomas, but requires CD4þ T-cell help for lymphomagenesis [47]. These findings suggest that humanized mice can model B-cell lymphomas with transcriptional similarities to human tumours after EBV and KSHV infection, and, that contributions of the tumour microenvironment to lymphomagenesis can be studied

Innate immune control of Epstein–Barr virus in huNSG mice
T-cell responses to Epstein– Barr virus infection in huNSG mice
Conclusion and outlook
39. Strowig T et al 2009 Priming of protective T cell
41. Chijioke O et al 2013 Human natural killer cells
44. Ma SD et al 2011 A new model of Epstein-Barr
45. Tsai MH et al 2017 The biological properties of
47. Ma SD et al 2015 LMP1-deficient Epstein-Barr virus
76. Raykova A et al 2017 Interleukins 12 and 15 induce
77. Williams H et al 2005 The immune response to
80. Azzi T et al 2014 Role for early-differentiated
84. Djaoud Z et al 2017 Two alternate strategies for
99. Gurer C et al 2008 Targeting the nuclear antigen 1
Findings
94. Amyes E et al 2003 Characterization of the CD4þ T

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.