Infection age as a predictor of epidemiological metrics for malaria

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate estimation of the burden of Plasmodium falciparum is essential for strategic planning for control and elimination. Due in part to the extreme heterogeneity in malaria exposure, immunity, other causes of disease, direct measurements of fever and disease attributable to malaria can be difficult. This can make a comparison of epidemiological metrics both within and between populations hard to interpret. An essential part of untangling this is an understanding of the complex time-course of malaria infections.MethodsHistoric data from malariatherapy infections, in which individuals were intentionally infected with malaria parasites, were reexamined in aggregate. In this analysis, the age of each infection was examined as a potential predictor describing aggregate patterns across all infections. A series of piecewise linear and generalized linear regressions were performed to highlight the infection age-dependent patterns in both parasitaemia and gametocytaemia, and from parasitaemia and gametocytaemia to fever and transmission probabilities, respectively.ResultsThe observed duration of untreated patent infection was 130 days. As infections progressed, the fraction of infections subpatent by microscopy was seen to increase steadily. The time-averaged malaria infections had three distinct phases in parasitaemia: a growth phase for the first 6 days of patency, a rapid decline from day 6 to day 18, and a slowly declining chronic phase for the remaining duration of the infection. During the growth phase, parasite densities increased sharply to a peak. Densities sharply decline for a short period of time after the peak. During the chronic phase, infections declined steadily as infections age. gametocytaemia was strongly correlated with lagged asexual parasitaemia. Fever rates and transmission efficiency were strongly correlated with parasitaemia and gametocytaemia. The comparison between raw data and prediction from the age of infection has good qualitative agreement across all quantities of interest for predicting averaged effects.ConclusionThe age of infection was established as a potentially useful covariate for malaria epidemiology. Infection age can be estimated given a history of exposure, and accounting for exposure history may potentially provide a new way to estimate malaria-attributable fever rates, transmission efficiency, and patent fraction in immunologically naïve individuals such as children and people in low-transmission regions. These data were collected from American adults with neurosyphilis, so there are reasons to be cautious about extending the quantitative results reported here to general populations in malaria-endemic regions. Understanding how immune responses modify these statistical relationships given past exposure is key for being able to apply these results more broadly.