Infection after intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures

Abstract

PurposeManagement of fracture-related infection (FRI) after intramedullary fixation (IF) is a challenge. The aim of the present study is to describe a series of 26 patients with FRI after IF and to evaluate factors possibly related to the outcome. MethodsBaseline variables were obtained at the time of IF: age, sex, body mass index, affected bone, open fracture, substance abuse, use of an external fixator, type of nail, reaming, soft-tissue reconstruction and surveillance culture result. After diagnosis of the infection, information was obtained about the time interval between IF and diagnosis and classification according to both the Willeneger and Roth and Makridis systems. Treatment modalities were grouped and analysed according to: use of antimicrobials, surgical debridement, nail removal or retention and spacer use. Cultures of bone or deep soft tissues were performed. Patients were followed up for 12 months, and outcomes (remission, relapse, death and loss of follow-up) were evaluated, as well as fracture consolidation. ResultsRemission was observed in 42.3% of patients. There was no significant association between any baseline variable and outcome. There was a significant association between Makridis stage 2 classification and recurrence or death. Treatment strategy was not significantly associated with outcome, and 65.4% of cases had positive culture results, with Enterobacter cloacae as the predominant agent. Consolidation was observed in 81.8% of patients and was not significantly related to the outcome. ConclusionThere was a significant association between Makridis classification and the outcome. Consolidation rate was not associated with the outcome regarding the treatment of the infection.