Abstract
The acoustic variation in language presents learners with a substantial challenge. To learn by tracking statistical regularities in speech, infants must recognize words across tokens that differ based on characteristics such as the speaker’s voice, affect, or the sentence context. Previous statistical learning studies have not investigated how these types of non-phonemic surface form variation affect learning. The present experiments used tasks tailored to two distinct developmental levels to investigate the robustness of statistical learning to variation. Experiment 1 examined statistical word segmentation in 11-month-olds and found that infants can recognize statistically segmented words across a change in the speaker’s voice from segmentation to testing. The direction of infants’ preferences suggests that recognizing words across a voice change is more difficult than recognizing them in a consistent voice. Experiment 2 tested whether 17-month-olds can generalize the output of statistical learning across variation to support word learning. The infants were successful in their generalization; they associated referents with statistically defined words despite a change in voice from segmentation to label learning. Infants’ learning patterns also indicate that they formed representations of across word syllable sequences during segmentation. Thus, low probability sequences can act as object labels in some conditions. The findings of these experiments suggest that the units that emerge during statistical learning are not perceptually constrained, but rather are robust to naturalistic acoustic variation.
Highlights
Very early in development, infants perform impressive feats of learning
The findings indicate that infants can use statistical learning to extract candidate words that are available to be associated with meanings
Experiment 2 examined whether 17-month-olds can generalize the output of statistical word segmentation across variation to support object label learning
Summary
Investigations of statistical learning have revealed that infants rapidly detect distributional patterns that are present in novel visual and auditory input (e.g., Saffran et al, 1996, 1999; Kirkham et al, 2002, 2007). The experimental evidence leaves little doubt that infants can detect statistical regularities in linguistic input. There is much less evidence regarding the degree to which the mechanisms at work in statistical learning experiments can contribute to development. It is not yet clear whether the representations that emerge from statistical learning possess the characteristics that are necessary to support language acquisition and processing A crucial question remains: is statistical learning useful for language acquisition? It is not yet clear whether the representations that emerge from statistical learning possess the characteristics that are necessary to support language acquisition and processing
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.