Abstract

ObjectiveTo elucidate the impact of the intended delivery mode on long-term outcomes among extremely preterm infants. Materials and methodsWomen who delivered singletons between 23 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks of gestation from January 2010 to March 2014 and their infants were included in this study. The cases of fetal growth restriction and those with a chromosomal or major structural abnormality were excluded. The cases of fetal death that was diagnosed before labor onset and cases of non-reassuring fetal status, placental abruptions or umbilical cord prolapse that was diagnosed at labor onset were also excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of composite adverse events, including death, cerebral palsy, or neurodevelopmental delay, at the age of three years. The composite adverse events, including death, grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, focal intestinal perforation, and sepsis of neonatal period, were assessed as short-term outcomes. The association between the intended delivery mode and primary outcome, short-term outcome, and each component was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. ResultsEighty cases were included in the analyses. Primary outcomes could be assessed in 72 cases. Infantile composite adverse events before discharge were observed in 19 cases (24%). The prevalence of primary outcomes was 40% (29 cases). The intended delivery mode was not associated with primary and short-term outcomes and each component complication. ConclusionAn advantage of intended cesarean delivery in terms of prognosis at three years of age in extremely preterm infants was not observed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call