Abstract

Sexually Selected Infanticide (SSI) is thought of as a male reproductive strategy in social mammalian species, because females who lose cubs may quickly re-enter oestrus. SSI has rarely been documented in non-social mammals and, in brown bears, SSI has been studied mainly in an eco-ethological perspective. The authors examined the first genetically documented infanticide case which occurred in May 2015 in brown bears in Italy (Trentino, Central-Eastern Alps). The infanticide killed two cubs and their mother. Hair samples were collected from the corpses as well as saliva, through swabs on mother’s wounds, with the aim of identifying the genotype of the perpetrator. The samples were genotyped by PCR amplification of 15 autosomal microsatellite loci, following the protocol routinely used for individual bear identifications within the Interregional Action Plan for Brown Bear Conservation in the Central-Eastern Alps (PACOBACE). Reliable genotypes were obtained from the mother, cubs and putative perpetrator. The genotypes were matched with those populating the PACOBACE database and genealogies were reconstructed. Both mother and perpetrator genotypes were already present in the database. Kinship analyses confirmed mother-cubs relationships and identified the father of the cubs. In this study, for the first time, the authors used the open-source LRmix STUDIO software, designed to analyse human forensic genetic profiles, to solve a case in wildlife. Through LRmix STUDIO, those alleles that do not belong to the victims were isolated and, finally, the perpetrator was identified. This study presents a method that allows, through the application of different models, the genetic identification of the conspecific perpetrator with the highest probability. The identification of the infanticidal male is relevant for the better management and conservation of wild populations with small effective population size (Ne) and low population growth rate, especially in the case of recently established populations in human-dominated landscapes. This procedure will have predictably wide applications, supplying important data in the monitoring of small and isolated populations.

Highlights

  • Infanticide, the killing of dependent offspring by conspecifics, has been thought of as a component of intersexual conflicts in social mammals (Hrdy 1979, Hrdy and Hausfater 1984)

  • This comparison allowed the identification of the mother, while the cubs were unknown and these were added them to the reference database, with the names of M33 and F22 (Table 1)

  • Given that: (i) the traces appear in conditions of Low Template-DNA (LT-DNA) and are likely affected by stochastic phenomena and are to be evaluated with extreme caution, in agreement with international guidelines (Gill et al 2007), (ii) the discrepancies found on locus cxx20, that emerge applying the consensus method, can reasonably be due to allelic drop-out (ADO) and (iii) the discrepancies found are anyway subjected to biostatistical evaluation with the probabilistic method of interpretation described above, according to the latest guidelines ISFG (Gill et al 2012), the results presented indicate that M7 contributed with its biological fluids to the composition of the swabs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Infanticide, the killing of dependent offspring by conspecifics, has been thought of as a component of intersexual conflicts in social mammals (Hrdy 1979, Hrdy and Hausfater 1984). Others document the killing of cubs by unmated females (Dean et al 1986, Hessing and Aumiller 1994). In isolated populations with a small number of reproductive adults, SSI can negatively impact the long-term conservation of the species, especially in the case where the female is killed while protecting her cubs. Taking this into account, the genetic identification of the perpetrators could give concrete indications for the management of small populations (e.g. placing radio-collars on infanticidal males to track them). Genetic studies for identifying infanticidal males have received little attention

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call