Abstract

ABSTRACT Anecdotal evidence indicates that high-status women in England generally did not breastfeed their children in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Metropolitan families of varied social status also often sent their children out of London for wet-nursing. However, anecdotal sources and rural burial registers also suggest that these practices declined rapidly from the mid-eighteenth century, and were replaced by a culture of maternal breastfeeding in all social classes. These changes in infant-feeding practices have been argued to explain much of the dramatic improvement in infant mortality rates in London in this period. Here we used quantitative evidence from a partial family reconstitution of the London parish of St. Martin in the Fields to test these claims. Using birth interval analysis to infer breastfeeding patterns in families by four categories of wealth, we found that birth intervals were close to the national average in pauper and poor families, but much shorter in wealthier families, in the period 1752–74. We also found evidence that many infants especially in wealthier families were missing from observation, consistent with high levels of rural wet-nursing. Both these phenomena declined between 1775 and 1812, suggesting a convergence in breastfeeding practices to the national norm. We used event history analysis, with corrections to aggregate rates for missing infants, to compare mortality rates over time and by wealth category. We found that infant mortality was initially higher in wealthier families, but declined in all groups over the period 1752–1812. We conclude that increases in maternal breastfeeding were probably important in improving survival of infants from wealthier families, however changes in breastfeeding patterns were insufficient to account for the ubiquitous improvements in mortality of urban-born infants in this period.

Highlights

  • This paper addresses the early origins of two key features of modern demographic regimes: the disappearance of the ‘urban penalty’, and the ubiquity of socioeconomic gradients in life expectancy

  • We start our analysis with an investigation of the length of time between births in reconstitution families, because breastfeeding habits exerted a major influence on birth

  • There appears to have been a convergence in breastfeeding habits, to those of the poor, in the last quarter of the eighteenth century

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper addresses the early origins of two key features of modern demographic regimes: the disappearance of the ‘urban penalty’, and the ubiquity of socioeconomic gradients in life expectancy. At the aggregate national - level neonates (infants in the first month of life) experienced the most significant improvements in survival (from a peak of 110 deaths per thousand births in the period 1675–99 to 57/1000 by 1800–24), and this accounted for almost all the observed reduction in infant mortality in the English population in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries Birth intervals were of below average duration in the market towns compared with rural parishes within the national Cambridge Group reconstitution sample (Wilson, 1986) In addition to these rather meagre quantitative data there is substantial documentary evidence from diaries and letters, medical accounts and advice manuals, that elite English women in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries generally did not breastfeed their own children (Campbell, 1989; Fildes, 1986, 1988a). Evidence of unobserved removal of children, probably for wet-nursing, made it necessary to apply adjustments to aggregated mortality rates to account for differences in the extent of missing children between status groups and over time

Sources and methods
Birth intervals and infant-feeding practices
Seasonality of infant mortality
Missing infants and rural wet-nursing
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call