Inequities in cancer outcomes between different healthcare systems in Brazil.

Abstract

31 Background: Studies have shown a clear difference among minority and economically disadvantaged patients. Less is known about marginalized populations in Brazil, a country that possesses a two-tiered healthcare system, based on socioeconomic status. We sought to explore differences in quality of life (QOL) and distress among patients receiving care within these systems. Methods: 270 patients were assessed for distress (DT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and QOL (FACT-G). Half of them was recruited at a private institution (PRI) and the other at a public institution (PUB) (each group: n=135; 68.9% breast and 31.1% gynecological cancers). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined QOL and distress using T-test and ANOVA. Results: We found ethnic differences between PUB (50.4% white, 32.6% mulato and 14.1% black) and PRI patients (82.9% white), and income disparities (PUB patients report almost a third less monthly income than PRI patients). PUB patients were mostly late-stage diagnosed 70.4% compared to PRI counterpart 42.2% (p<.001). In general PUB patients reported higher rates of distress and anxiety/depression (p<.03); and poorer QoL outcomes (p<.01). Conclusions: This preliminary study is one of the first to investigate inequities in cancer outcomes among patients in Brazilian healthcare settings. Analyses revealed notable differences between groups across demographic characteristics, while individuals of lower socioeconomic status reported significantly poorer psychosocial outcomes. These results suggest a complex interaction between ethnicity, access to care and cancer outcomes, and warrants further research to better understand and address these inequities. Further discussion of the role of psycho-oncology research and clinical practice in reducing disparate outcomes among Brazilian cancer patients is warranted.