Abstract

Governments perpetually align their policies to satisfy shifts in voters' relative demand for economic growth versus social equality. Following such shifts, increases (decreases) in government interventions lower (raise) both inequality and growth. This pattern is stronger in egalitarian countries, where a culturally determined belief in luck as main source of income heterogeneity renders both equality and growth to be important policy objectives. I provide robust empirical support for this mechanism in a panel of 38 countries over the period 1964-2004. I also suggest a simple extension to the theoretical framework of Alesina and Angeletos (2005) to analytically motivate it.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.