Abstract

A conjecture posed by S. Hayajneh and F. Kittaneh claims that given A, B positive matrices, 0≤t≤1, and any unitarily invariant norm the following inequality holds⦀AtB1−t+BtA1−t⦀≤⦀AtB1−t+A1−tBt⦀. Recently, R. Bhatia proved the inequality for the case of the Frobenius norm and for t∈[14,34]. In this paper, using complex methods we extend this result to complex values of the parameter t=z in the strip {z∈C:Re(z)∈[14,34]}. We give an elementary proof of the fact that equality holds for some z in the strip if and only if A and B commute. We also show a counterexample to the general conjecture by exhibiting a pair of positive matrices such that the claim does not hold for the uniform norm. Finally, we give a counterexample for a related singular value inequality given by sj(AtB1−t+BtA1−t)≤sj(A+B), answering in the negative a question made by K. Audenaert and F. Kittaneh. The methods of proof and examples can be adapted with no modifications to operator algebras (infinite dimensional setting), for instance it follows that the inequality above holds for Hilbert–Schmidt operators with their Banach algebra norm derived from the infinite trace of B(H).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.