Inequalities in employment and gender differences in the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders cases: a nationwide survey from Brazil, 2019

Abstract

ObjectivesThe present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) and to determine whether differences regarding the employment status (standard and non-standard), according to gender, increased the probability of WRMDs. Study designCross-sectional study. MethodsData from the 2019 National Health Survey (NHS) in Brazil were used. In total, 50,066 participants, both women and men, aged 18–65 years were included. Data were analysed for self-reported WRMDs. The binary logistic regression model, adjusting for possible covariables, was used to evaluate the association between working in the labour market and the occurrence of WRMDs. For covariates in the multivariate analysis, a P-value of <0.20 was considered in the univariate analysis. The variables with a P-value of <0.05 remained in the model. The odds ratio (OR), together with their confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI), were estimates both in the univariate and multivariate models. ResultsThe prevalence of WRMDs was higher in women (4.2%) than men (1.9%). The likelihood of WRMDs was associated with the employment status only among men and proved to be lower for non-standard employment than standard employment (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.43–0.87). Only among women, an increase in the likelihood of WRMDs associated with exposure to occupational noise was observed (OR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.31–2.38) and a less favourable self-reported health (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.08–2.54). Results showed higher change of WRMD for men and women associated with rheumatoid arthritis (men: OR = 3.94; 95% CI = 2.10–7.38; women: OR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.68–3.39), depression (men: OR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.54–4.45; women: OR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.68–3.39) and occupational accidents (men: OR = 4.36; 95% CI = 2.34–8.14; women: OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.19–4.07). ConclusionsIt is possible that the “double presence” that involves both the productive and reproductive spheres explains the higher prevalence of WRMDs among women Indicators that are sensitive to the effects of gender norms are necessary to understand the context of inequalities in the prevalence of WRMDs. The results of this study should be considered when developing strategies in the workplace and public health policies to reduce the prevalence of WRMDs.