Abstract

Agency problems are often cited to explain why managers diversify their firms even though diversification strategies are often claimed to destroy value. In theory, however, conglomeration can be beneficial and the popular press often discusses conglomeration decisions as being driven by industry conditions. We argue that value maximization theories of conglomeration imply that two industry factors (growth opportunities and industry concentration) are negatively related to predicted degrees of conglomeration and find empirical support in a panel of 50 industries across 20 years. Our study also documents that conglomerate structures are more valuable when industry conditions predict high levels of conglomeration. Although our evidence does not rule out the existence of agency-motivated conglomeration, we conclude that value-maximization plays an important role.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.