Abstract

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments are well defined in health authority guidelines for small molecule drugs, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidance is now available for therapeutic proteins. However, there are currently no regulatory guidelines outlining DDI assessments for therapeutic peptides, which poses significant uncertainty and challenges during drug development for this heterogenous class of molecules. A cross-industry peptide DDI working group consisting of experts from 10 leading companies was formed under the sponsorship of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. We aimed to capture the range of DDI studies undertaken for peptide drugs by (i) anonymously surveying relevant companies involved in peptide drug development to better understand DDI study type/timing currently performed and (ii) compiling a database containing in vitro / clinical DDI data from submission packages for recently approved peptide drugs. Our analyses highlight significant gaps and uncertainty in the field. For example, the reported timing of in vitro peptide DDI studies, if performed, vary substantially across responding companies from early research to phase III. Nearly all in vitro cytochrome P450 / transporter inhibition studies reported in the survey were negative. For the few positive hits reported, no clinical follow-up studies were performed, questioning the clinical relevance of these findings. Furthermore, available submission packages reveal DDI likelihood is low for peptides >2kDa, making it reasonable to adopt a risk-based approach during drug development for larger peptides. By benchmarking the landscape of peptide DDI activities across the industry, we set the stage for future discussions with health authorities on harmonizing peptide DDI approaches.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call