Abstract

Despite the benefits of ex post facto reasoning, what remains in dispute is the interpretation of the factors responsible for the emergence of the newly industrialising countries (NICs) of East and Southeast Asia. Here it is argued that the dominant perspective, that deriving from neoclassical economics, is both defective and misrepresentative. In an attempt to overcome these inadequacies recourse is made to radical political economy perspectives to understand better the significance of industrialisation in the NICs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call