Abstract

The gains of a country from participating in global value chains (GVCs) will depend on the productive activities taking place in its jurisdiction and their linkages to the domestic economy. Lead firms’ decision on where to locate and how to coordinate production activities is influenced, among others, by industrial policies. On the one side, policy space provides governments with some leverage in guiding economic activities and influencing development outcomes. On the other hand, policy risks have the potential to adversely affect the outcomes. This study focuses on industrial policies in Indonesia, using the mineral sector as a mini case study. The case study assesses the Indonesian Government’s recent effort to boost domestic value addition in the sector. This paper argues that the effectiveness of government policies in maximizing the gains from GVC participation depends not only on policy design, but also on policy consistency and coherence, effective implementation, and coordination.

Highlights

  • International production sharing means greater opportunity for country and firm participation in global value chains (GVCs)

  • The choice of sector is made in light of the explicit aspiration of the Government of Indonesia (GOI) to boost domestic value added by encouraging downstreaming in the sector

  • To meet the goal of the MP3EI, Indonesia needs to achieve a quantitative target of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of $15,000 by 2025, a marked increase from its current $3,500

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

International production sharing means greater opportunity for country and firm participation in global value chains (GVCs). Governments’ concerns go beyond GVC participation and its immediate returns, and include broader and longer term public policy objectives, such as the number and quality of jobs created, the non-economic impact of industrial activities, the dynamic scope for upgrading, skills and knowledge development, and more generally, contributions to economic diversification and resilience. From a GVC perspective, industrial policy can be targeted at specific activities in a particular sector or industry that are deemed to deliver greater benefits to the economy. The choice of sector is made in light of the explicit aspiration of the Government of Indonesia (GOI) to boost domestic value added by encouraging downstreaming in the sector It is inspired by the shared aspiration of many other resource-rich economies to do the same. The study hopes to shed some light on the lessons and complexities that arise from the pursuit of this objective

Economic Profile
Trade Profile
10 Thailand
INDUSTRIAL POLICIES IN INDONESIA: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
Main Industrial Policy Trajectory
Assessment of Other Policy Objectives
Improving the Effectiveness of Policy Implementation
Infrastructure Catch-up
Economic Corridors
Power and Energy
Global Connection
FROM POLICY TO IMPLEMENTATION
Trade Taxes
Non-tariff Measures
Tax Facilities
Upgrading Support
Investment Regime
Local Content
The Weakest Link
Overview
Sectoral Policy Objectives
From Policy to Implementation
Lessons for Policy Recommendations
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Findings
42 | References
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.