Abstract
This paper presents the two conventional approaches to modelling of human decision making. The inductive approach emphasises the anchoring in empirical data. The deductive approach is based on accepted assumtions from formal decision theory. A comparison of the resulting models show that the outcome is very sirnilar. It is argued that this is because modeiling of decision making basically is a hermeneutical exercise, hence neither purely inductive or deductive. An adequate model of decision making in man-machine systems must be based on a description that captures the complexity of both man and machine, such as Cognitive Systems Engineering. This leads to two essential assumptions about decision making systems, that they must be both causa! and intentional. An alternate cybemetic approach to modeiling of decision making, which includes both of theseassumptions, is briefly described.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.