Induction of specific locus mutations in mouse spermatogonial stem cells by combined chemical X-ray treatments

Abstract

Data that demonstrate how the biology of spermatogenesis plays an important role in determining the yield of genetic damage from ionizing radiation are briefly reviewed. It is suggested that for valid extrapolations of data from mouse mutation experiments to man detailed knowledge of the spermatogonial stem cell systems in the two speicies is required. Two new sets of mouse specific mutation data are presented. (1)When a 2 mg/kg dose of triethylenemelamine (TEM) was used as a conditioning dose and followed 24 h later by 6 Gy X-rays, the mutation yield from spermatogonial stem cells was over twice as high (30.20 × 10 −5/locus/gamete) as that when the X-ray dose was given alone (13.75 × 10 −5/locus/gamete). No such effect was found when the TEM was given only 3 h prior to the X-irradiation. Since TEM at the dose used is inefficient at inducing specific-locus mutations, an augmentation of the X-ray response is indicated. It has therefore been concluded that the augmented mutation responses obtained with equal 24 h X-ray fractionations at high dose are attributable to mutation induction by the second dose. The responsive cells would be the formerly resistant component of the stem cell population that had survived the TEM treatment and that had been ‘triggered’ into a radiosensitive phase by the population depletion. (2) When 2 doses of 500 mg/kg hydroxyurea (HU) were given 3 h apart 3 h prior to 6 Gy X-rays to reduce the numbers of stem cells in the S and G2 phases of the cell exposed to the radiation, the mutation responses was greatly enhanced to a level that is the highest yet recorded per unit X-ray dose (7.10 × 10 −5/locus/gamete/Gy). No such effect was obtained when the intervals between the HU and X-ray treatments were either shorter (<0.5 h) or longer (24 h). It was concluded that X-ray-induced specific-locus mutations derive principally from stem cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The reasons why the X-ray-induced mutation-yields from repopulating stem cells (with a short cell cycle and, hence, short G1 phase) are similar to those from undamaged stem cell populations, in contrast to translocation yields, therefore remains unresolved.