Abstract
Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel framing (LSF). Regardless of the proliferation of LSF buildings, a lack of experimental research studies have been performed on this construction system in terms of the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort in the Southern European climate context. Moreover, a research gap also exists regarding experimental comparisons with typical brick masonry buildings. The present study focused on this research gap by characterising and comparing the performance of these two construction systems. A long-term experimental campaign was carried out, involving the construction and monitoring of two identical test cells, differing only by construction system. The test cells were located in Portugal and were monitored over an entire year. The results revealed that the LSF experimental test cell presented higher daily indoor air temperature fluctuations, leading to more extreme maximum and minimum values, closely following the outdoor dry bulb temperature variations. The more responsive behaviour was also reflected in the indoor thermal comfort analysis, with the LSF cell presenting slightly worse performance; however, some advantages were also observed regarding the LSF construction system, which could provide benefits during intermittent residential occupation, especially in mild climates, in which overheating is not a major concern.
Highlights
In Europe, people spend almost 90% of their time indoors, and it is estimated that twothirds of this time is at home [1]
The main research target of this study is to qualitatively describe and evaluate the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort of residential light steel framing (LSF) buildings in the Southern European climatic zone
The main goals of the present experimental research study were two-fold: (i) to characterise and discuss the thermal environment of the test cells in terms of indoor air temperature profiles; (ii) to assess the indoor thermal comfort of the test cells considering the differences in terms of dynamic thermal behaviour
Summary
In Europe, people spend almost 90% of their time indoors, and it is estimated that twothirds of this time is at home [1]. Residential buildings are becoming progressively more important, as living places and for work and professional use. Considering this reality, it is a core requirement that buildings can provide a healthy and comfortable indoor environment for their occupants. To this end, achieving an appropriate indoor thermal environment is an essential requirement. The influence of indoor thermal comfort has been a subject of research for several authors. The impacts are recognised at several levels, including impacts on human health [2,3], work productivity [4], human physiology [5,6], and energy consumption [7,8]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.