Abstract

Most existing indoor localization algorithms based on Wi-Fi signals mainly rely on wireless access points (APs), i.e. hotspots, with fixed deployment, which are easily affected by the non-line of sight (NLOS) factors and the multipath effect. There also exist many other problems, such as positioning stability and blind spots, which can cause decline in positioning accuracy at certain positions, or even failure of positioning. However, it will increase the hardware cost by adding more static APs; if the localization mechanism integrates different wireless signals is adopted, it tends to cause high cost of positioning and long complex positioning process, etc. In this paper, we proposed a novel hybrid Wi-Fi access point-based localization algorithm (HAPLA), which utilizes the received signal strength indications (RSSI) from static APs and dynamic APs to determine location scenes. It flexibly selects available AP signals and dynamically switches the positioning methods, thus to achieve efficient positioning. HAPLA only relies on the Wi-Fi signal strength values, which can reduce the cost of hardware and the complexity of localization system. The proposed method can also be able to effectively prevent interference from different signal sources. In our test scenario, we deployed typical indoor scenes with the NLOS factors and the multipath effect for experiments. The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed method and the results show that, compared with the classic K nearest neighbor-based location algorithm (KNN) and the variance-based fingerprint distance adjustment algorithm (VFDA), HAPLA has better adaptability and higher positioning accuracy, and can effectively solve the problem of positioning blind spots.

Highlights

  • The location based services (LBS) have attracted wide attention and concern from the researchers, and how to achieve efficient and accurate positioning is the key point in current research

  • The algorithms widely used in the field of indoor location based on Wi-Fi include the angle of arrival localization algorithm (AOA), the time of arrival localization algorithm (TOA), the time difference of arrival localization algorithm (TDOA), the received signal strength indication localization algorithm (RSSI), the fingerprint-based localization algorithm, and so on [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]

  • The wireless channel model for indoor propagation is based on WLAN, and considering the relation between the intensity and distance in signal propagation and the loss of RSSI generated by the multipath effect and non-line of sight (NLOS) in the propagation process, it does not need to carry out the collection for the off-line fingerprint database, and it can adapt to the changes of positioning regions soon

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The location based services (LBS) have attracted wide attention and concern from the researchers, and how to achieve efficient and accurate positioning is the key point in current research. To solve the above problems, researchers have proposed different approaches based on data fusion, including: combining the positioning algorithms of WLAN channel propagation model and the intensity value of RSSI signals to achieve indoor fingerprint-based localization [15]; integrating positioning methods of the Ultra-Wideband (UWB) with the differential global positioning system (DGPS) [16]; the AOA/TDOA-based hybrid localization algorithm[17]; the collaborative indoor localization method based on Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [18]; the indoor localization system based on RSSI and low power Bluetooth [19]; the real-time indoor localization mechanism based on RFID and Bluetooth [20]; the indoor localization system based on the combination of inertial sensors and Wi-Fi [21]; the comprehensive pedestrian and indoor localization system of Wi-Fi and geomagnetic information [22]; the indoor localization mechanism based on the data fusion of multi-sensors [23]; the hybrid indoor localization system based on multi-sensors, Wi-Fi and Low Energy Bluetooth (BLE)_ [24]; the hybrid indoor localization based on wireless signals, multi-sensors and video data [25], etc These hybrid localization algorithms usually need to rely on a variety of sensors and different types of wireless signals to improve the positioning accuracy, which have the defects of high cost, long process of localization and difficulties of positioning and deployment, etc. It can effectively prevent different positioning signal sources from interfering with each other during the process of localization

RELATED WORKS
Localization scenarios
Algorithm
Workflow
EXPERIMENTS AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Performance Index
Findings
Experimental Scenarios
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call