Abstract

In mobile social groups, influence patterns driving group movement can vary between democratic and despotic. The arrival at any single pattern of influence is thought to be underpinned by both environmental factors and group composition. To identify the specific patterns of influence driving travel decision-making in a chacma baboon troop, we used spatially explicit data to extract patterns of individual movement bias. We scaled these estimates of individual-level bias to the level of the group by constructing an influence network and assessing its emergent structural properties. Our results indicate that there is heterogeneity in movement bias: individual animals respond consistently to particular group members, and higher-ranking animals are more likely to influence the movement of others. This heterogeneity resulted in a group-level network structure that consisted of a single core and two outer shells. Here, the presence of a core suggests that a set of highly interdependent animals drove routine group movements. These results suggest that heterogeneity at the individual level can lead to group-level influence structures, and that movement patterns in mobile social groups can add to the exploration of both how these structures develop (i.e. mechanistic aspects) and what consequences they have for individual- and group-level outcomes (i.e. functional aspects).

Highlights

  • Individual-level movement bias leads to the formation of higher-order social structure in a mobile group of baboons

  • These results suggest that heterogeneity at the individual level can lead to group-level influence structures, and that movement patterns in mobile social groups can add to the exploration of both how these structures develop and what consequences they have for individual- and group-level outcomes

  • While Strandburg-Peshkin et al [3] and Farine et al [7] are concerned with how animals reach consensus in collective decision-making, and how these influence the emergent structure of the group-level properties in terms of its speed, shape and directedness [9], we are interested in exploring whether individual movements can identify emergent social structures within the group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individual-level movement bias leads to the formation of higher-order social structure in a mobile group of baboons. To identify the specific patterns of influence driving travel decision-making in a chacma baboon troop, we used spatially explicit data to extract patterns of individual movement bias. Ursinus) found that animals preferentially followed close social associates when leaving sleeping sites [4,8] Taken together, these studies suggest that social relations serve to regulate patterns of collective movement, but that individual influence may vary with context. While Strandburg-Peshkin et al [3] and Farine et al [7] are concerned with how animals reach consensus in collective decision-making, and how these influence the emergent structure of the group-level properties in terms of its speed, shape and directedness [9], we are interested in exploring whether individual movements can identify emergent social structures within the group

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call