Abstract

BackgroundReliable recognition of individuals requires phenotypic identity signatures that are both individually distinctive and appropriately stable over time. Individual-specific vocalisations or visual patterning are well documented among birds and some mammals, whilst odours play a key role in social recognition across many vertebrates and invertebrates. Less well understood, though, is whether individuals are recognised through variation in cues that arise incidentally from a wide variety of genetic and non-genetic differences between individuals, or whether animals evolve distinctive polymorphic signals to advertise identity reliably. As a bioassay to understand the derivation of individual-specific odour signatures, we use female attraction to the individual odours of male house mice (Mus musculus domesticus), learned on contact with a male’s scent marks.ResultsLearned volatile odour signatures are determined predominantly by individual differences in involatile major urinary protein (MUP) signatures, a specialised set of communication proteins that mice secrete in their urine. Recognition of odour signatures in genetically distinct mice depended on differences in individual MUP genotype. Direct manipulation using recombinant MUPs confirmed predictable changes in volatile signature recognition according to the degree of matching between MUP profiles and the learned urine template. Both the relative amount of the male-specific MUP pheromone darcin, which induces odour learning, and other MUP isoforms influenced learned odour signatures. By contrast, odour recognition was not significantly influenced by individual major histocompatibility complex genotype. MUP profiles shape volatile odour signatures through isoform-specific differences in binding and release of urinary volatiles from scent deposits, such that volatile signatures were recognised from the urinary protein fraction alone. Manipulation using recombinant MUPs led to quantitative changes in the release of known MUP ligands from scent deposits, with MUP-specific and volatile-specific effects.ConclusionsDespite assumptions that many genes contribute to odours that can be used to recognise individuals, mice have evolved a polymorphic combinatorial MUP signature that shapes distinctive volatile signatures in their scent. Such specific signals may be more prevalent within complex body odours than previously realised, contributing to the evolution of phenotypic diversity within species. However, differences in selection may also result in species-specific constraints on the ability to recognise individuals through complex body scents.

Highlights

  • Reliable recognition of individuals requires phenotypic identity signatures that are both individually distinctive and appropriately stable over time

  • major urinary protein (MUP) influence on urinary volatiles Correspondence between MUP and urinary volatile phenotypes As the specific composition of urinary MUPs plays such a major role in determining the volatile signatures that mice learn, we examined the correspondence between individual MUP type and the profile of airborne volatiles emitted from urine streaks

  • We show that house mice learn attraction to a specific volatile signature that is shaped by the profile of polymorphic MUPs in a male’s scent mark

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reliable recognition of individuals requires phenotypic identity signatures that are both individually distinctive and appropriately stable over time. Though, is whether individuals are recognised through variation in cues that arise incidentally from a wide variety of genetic and non-genetic differences between individuals, or whether animals evolve distinctive polymorphic signals to advertise identity reliably. Individual conspecifics are recognised, for example, through vocalisations in many bird, anuran and mammal species [4,5,6], by visual facial features in primates [7, 8] and some paper wasps [9], or through odour differences in many mammals [10, 11] and insects [12]. Less well understood is the extent to which such polymorphic signatures evolve to provide individually distinctive signals that advertise the signaller’s identity, because of benefits to the signaller derived from being recognised. Understanding how distinctiveness arises in the features used for recognition is essential to establish whether animals use evolved signals or incidental cues

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call