Abstract

Federal old-age insurance, a form of social insurance, is an attempt to simultaneously implement two principles: individual equity and social adequacy. In this paper, traditionally accepted definitions of these two concepts are reexamined, and they are quantified by using hypothetical cases of retired workers with varying contribution records. The conclusion is that the old-age insurance program is implementing not only individual equity but also social adequacy for all retired workers and that the degree of social adequacy is greater for the high-wage earner than for the low-wage earner. As a policy implication, it is suggested that social adequacy be equalized in order to make possible a higher minimum benefit.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.