Abstract

The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the auditory nervous system’s representation of periodic sound, and may serve as a marker of training-related enhancements, behavioural deficits, and clinical conditions. However, FFRs of healthy normal subjects show considerable variability that remains unexplained. We investigated whether the FFR representation of the frequency content of a complex tone is related to the perception of the pitch of the fundamental frequency. The strength of the fundamental frequency in the FFR of 39 people with normal hearing was assessed when they listened to complex tones that either included or lacked energy at the fundamental frequency. We found that the strength of the fundamental representation of the missing fundamental tone complex correlated significantly with people's general tendency to perceive the pitch of the tone as either matching the frequency of the spectral components that were present, or that of the missing fundamental. Although at a group level the fundamental representation in the FFR did not appear to be affected by the presence or absence of energy at the same frequency in the stimulus, the two conditions were statistically distinguishable for some subjects individually, indicating that the neural representation is not linearly dependent on the stimulus content. In a second experiment using a within-subjects paradigm, we showed that subjects can learn to reversibly select between either fundamental or spectral perception, and that this is accompanied both by changes to the fundamental representation in the FFR and to cortical-based gamma activity. These results suggest that both fundamental and spectral representations coexist, and are available for later auditory processing stages, the requirements of which may also influence their relative strength and thus modulate FFR variability. The data also highlight voluntary mode perception as a new paradigm with which to study top-down vs bottom-up mechanisms that support the emerging view of the FFR as the outcome of integrated processing in the entire auditory system.

Highlights

  • The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) to complex sounds [1] may present a paradox: whereas it is thought to capture how the auditory system represents basic features of sound with high fidelity [2,3,4] and reliability [5,6], several of its features vary considerably between listeners, even amongst a homogenous sample of young, healthy adults [7]

  • The phase-locking value (PLV) and spectral amplitudes at f0 were highly correlated in both conditions (FP: rs = 0.80, p = 2.7e-08; MF: rs = 0.82, p = 7.5e-09), confirming that the two measures contain shared information both in the responses to fundamental present responses as has already been shown [62], and in missing fundamental responses used here

  • We show that inter-individual variability in the FFR's f0 representation is related to differences in how individuals perceive sound

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) to complex sounds [1] may present a paradox: whereas it is thought to capture how the auditory system represents basic features of sound with high fidelity [2,3,4] and reliability [5,6], several of its features vary considerably between listeners, even amongst a homogenous sample of young, healthy adults [7] This inconsistency is surprising, because subtle variations in the frequency content, temporal precision, and inter-trial consistency of FFRs have been linked to enhanced processing in expert groups like musicians Our goal is to determine if inter-individual variability in f0 strength is related to inter-indivual variability in perception

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call