Abstract

People with normal hearing thresholds can nonetheless have difficulty with understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. The origins of such supra-threshold hearing deficits remain largely unclear. Previously we showed that the auditory brainstem response to running speech is modulated by selective attention, evidencing a subcortical mechanism that contributes to speech-in-noise comprehension. We observed, however, significant variation in the magnitude of the brainstem’s attentional modulation between the different volunteers. Here we show that this variability relates to the ability of the subjects to understand speech in background noise. In particular, we assessed 43 young human volunteers with normal hearing thresholds for their speech-in-noise comprehension. We also recorded their auditory brainstem responses to running speech when selectively attending to one of two competing voices. To control for potential peripheral hearing deficits, and in particular for cochlear synaptopathy, we further assessed noise exposure, the temporal sensitivity threshold, the middle-ear muscle reflex, and the auditory-brainstem response to clicks in various levels of background noise. These tests did not show evidence for cochlear synaptopathy amongst the volunteers. Furthermore, we found that only the attentional modulation of the brainstem response to speech was significantly related to speech-in-noise comprehension. Our results therefore evidence an impact of top-down modulation of brainstem activity on the variability in speech-in-noise comprehension amongst the subjects.

Highlights

  • Research on the role of these neural feedback loops for speech-in-noise listening has mostly focused on the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR), in which stimulation of the medial olivocochlear fibers that synapse on the outer hair cells in the cochlea reduces cochlear amplification across a wide frequency band[13]

  • It remains debated whether the reduction of cochlear amplification through the MOCR contributes to better speech-in-noise comprehension in humans: some studies found evidence for this hypothesis[18,19,20,21,22] whereas others did not[23,24] and yet others found the opposite behaviour[25,26]

  • To investigate our hypotheses regarding a correlation between the attentional modulation of the brainstem response to speech and speech-in-noise comprehension, we sought to control for cochlear synaptopathy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding speech in noisy backgrounds such as other competing speakers is a challenging task at which humans excel[1,2] It requires the separation of different sound sources, selective attention to the target speaker, and the processing of degraded signals[3,4,5] Hearing impairment such as resulting from noise exposure often leads to an increase of hearing thresholds, a reduction in the information conveyed about a sound to the central auditory system, and to greater difficulty in understanding speech in noise[6,7,8] even listeners with normal hearing thresholds can have problems with understanding speech in noisy environments[9,10]. Computational modelling as well as animal studies have shown that such reduced broad-band amplification can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of a transient signal embedded in background noise[14,15,16,17] It remains debated whether the reduction of cochlear amplification through the MOCR contributes to better speech-in-noise comprehension in humans: some studies found evidence for this hypothesis[18,19,20,21,22] whereas others did not[23,24] and yet others found the opposite behaviour[25,26]. A potential source of variation in the brainstem response to speech, as well as in speech-in-noise comprehension, is cochlear synaptopathy, a loss of synaptic connection between the auditory-nerve fibers and the mechanosensitive hair cells in the inner ear[32]. To investigate our hypotheses regarding a correlation between the attentional modulation of the brainstem response to speech and speech-in-noise comprehension, we sought to control for cochlear synaptopathy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call