Abstract

Fundamental frequency (F0, perceived as voice pitch) predicts sex and age, hormonal status, mating success and a range of social traits, and thus functions as an important biosocial marker in modal speech. Yet, the role of F0 in human nonverbal vocalizations remains unclear, and given considerable variability in F0 across call types, it is not known whether F0 cues to vocalizer attributes are shared across speech and nonverbal vocalizations. Here, using a corpus of vocal sounds from 51 men and women, we examined whether individual differences in F0 are retained across neutral speech, valenced speech and nonverbal vocalizations (screams, roars and pain cries). Acoustic analyses revealed substantial variability in F0 across vocal types, with mean F0 increasing as much as 10-fold in screams compared to speech in the same individual. Despite these extreme pitch differences, sexual dimorphism was preserved within call types and, critically, inter-individual differences in F0 correlated across vocal types (r = 0.36–0.80) with stronger relationships between vocal types of the same valence (e.g. 38% of the variance in roar F0 was predicted by aggressive speech F0). Our results indicate that biologically and socially relevant indexical cues in the human voice are preserved in simulated valenced speech and vocalizations, including vocalizations characterized by extreme F0 modulation, suggesting that voice pitch may function as a reliable individual and biosocial marker across disparate communication contexts.

Highlights

  • Fundamental frequency (F0, perceived as voice pitch) predicts sex and age, hormonal status, mating success and a range of social traits, and functions as an important biosocial marker in modal speech

  • Our results indicate that biologically and socially relevant indexical cues in the human voice are preserved in simulated valenced speech and vocalizations, including vocalizations characterized by extreme F0 modulation, suggesting that voice pitch may function as a reliable individual and biosocial marker across disparate communication contexts

  • Separate linear mixed model (LMM) conducted for each vocal type confirmed that men’s mean F0 was significantly lower 5 than women’s for each vocal type, including modal speech, all valenced speech and nonverbal vocalizations

Read more

Summary

Participants

We recorded the voices of 51 drama or acting students from the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama (London, UK) and the University of Sussex (Brighton, UK). No participant reported conditions that could affect their voice (e.g. cold, sore throat, chronic smoking)

Voice recording
Acoustic analysis
Statistical analysis
Sexual dimorphism in F0 across vocal types
Stability of individual differences in F0 across vocal types
Discussion
Sorokowski P et al 2019 Voice of authority
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call