Abstract

Response inhibition is a hallmark of executive control and crucial to support flexible behavior in a constantly changing environment. Recently, it has been shown that response inhibition is influenced by the presentation of emotional stimuli (Verbruggen and De Houwer, 2007). Healthy individuals typically differ in the degree to which they are able to regulate their emotional state, but it remains unknown whether individual differences in emotion regulation (ER) may alter the interplay between emotion and response inhibition. Here we address this issue by testing healthy volunteers who were equally divided in groups with high and low heart rate variability (HRV) during rest, a physiological measure that serves as proxy of ER. Both groups performed an emotional stop-signal task, in which negative high arousing pictures served as negative emotional stimuli and neutral low arousing pictures served as neutral non-emotional stimuli. We found that individuals with high HRV activated and inhibited their responses faster compared to individuals with low HRV, but only in the presence of negative stimuli. No group differences emerged for the neutral stimuli. Thus, individuals with low HRV are more susceptible to the adverse effects of negative emotion on response initiation and inhibition. The present research corroborates the idea that the presentation of emotional stimuli may interfere with inhibition and it also adds to previous research by demonstrating that the aforementioned relationship varies for individuals differing in HRV. We suggest that focusing on individual differences in HRV and its associative ER may shed more light on the dynamic interplay between emotion and cognition.

Highlights

  • A vast body of literature has underscored the effect of emotions on executive control (Pessoa, 2008, 2009)

  • In the present paper we focus on how individual differences in heart rate variability (HRV), a measure associated with emotion regulation (ER) (Appelhans and Luecken, 2006), may translate in differences in response initiation and response stopping

  • Participants gave more incorrect responses during negative trials compared to neutral trials (t 63 = 3.75, p < 0.001), indicating that negative stimuli affect the accuracy in the stop-signal task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A vast body of literature has underscored the effect of emotions on executive control (Pessoa, 2008, 2009). People need more time to name the color of emotional words compared to non-emotional ones (Williams et al, 1996; Phaf and Kan, 2007) or to withhold a planned response after the presentation of emotional compared to neutral stimuli (Verbruggen and De Houwer, 2007). It remains unknown whether the above outcomes vary across individuals that differ in their ability to process emotional stimuli, an ability referred to as emotion regulation (ER; Gross, 1998). In the present paper we focus on how individual differences in heart rate variability (HRV), a measure associated with ER (Appelhans and Luecken, 2006), may translate in differences in response initiation and response stopping

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call