Abstract

BackgroundFew longitudinal studies have described the variation in LBP and its impact over time at an individual level. The aims of this study were to: 1) determine the prevalence of LBP in three surveys over a 9-year period in the Danish general population, using five different definitions of LBP, 2) study their individual long-term courses, and 3) determine the odds of reporting subsequent LBP when having reported previous LBP.MethodsA cohort of 625 men and women aged 40 was sampled from the general population. Questions about LBP were asked at ages 41, 45 and 49, enabling individual courses to be tracked across five different definitions of LBP. Results were reported as percentages and the prognostic influence on future LBP was reported as odds ratios (OR).ResultsQuestionnaires were completed by 412 (66%), 348 (56%) and 293 (47%) persons respectively at each survey. Of these, 293 (47%) completed all three surveys. The prevalence of LBP did not change significantly over time for any LBP past year: 69, 68, 70%; any LBP past month: 42, 48, 41%; >30 days LBP past year: 25, 27, 24%; seeking care for LBP past year: 28, 30, 36%; and non-trivial LBP, i.e. LBP >30 days past year including consequences: 18, 20, 20%. For LBP past year, 2/3 remained in this category, whereas four out of ten remained over the three time-points for the other definitions of LBP. Reporting LBP defined in any of these ways significantly increased the odds for the same type of LBP 4 years later. For those with the same definition of LBP at both 41 and 45 years, the risk of also reporting the same at 49 years was even higher, regardless of definition, and most strongly for seeking care and non-trivial LBP (OR 17.6 and 18.4) but less than 11% were in these groups.ConclusionThe prevalence rates of LBP, when defined in a number of ways, were constant over time at a group level, but did not necessarily involve the same individuals. Reporting more severe LBP indicated a higher risk of also reporting future LBP but less than 11% were in these categories at each survey.

Highlights

  • Few longitudinal studies have described the variation in Low back pain (LBP) and its impact over time at an individual level

  • No statistically significant differences in proportions were found between participants with and without LBP

  • Regardless of the definition of LBP, the main findings were that: (i) the proportions of people reporting each specific definition of LBP were constant over time, fluctuations occurred for most individuals; (ii) the proportion of people reporting longlasting, care-seeking and non-trivial LBP at all three surveys was relatively small; (iii) those belonging to the most ‘severe’ LBP categories had higher risk of reporting it again in the subsequent surveys

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Few longitudinal studies have described the variation in LBP and its impact over time at an individual level. The definitions of LBP and their prevalence estimates varied considerably with the heterogeneity. Longitudinal studies that describe individual courses of LBP are not very common. Another review of globally reported LBP estimated recurrence rates within one year to vary between 24 and 80% [5]. Both reviews revealed a large variation in definitions of LBP, age ranges, occupational groups, time to, and number of follow ups, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the individual courses of LBP

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call