Abstract

This article argues for the potential contribution of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to democratisation and development in post‐apartheid South Africa. This argument requires a response to individual and social justice based criticisms as well as an appreciation of the hard choices underlying the TRC process. While acknowledging the tensions between individual, criminal justice and the TRC, the uncritical acceptance of conventional criminal justice as the yardstick by which to measure the TRC is challenged, especially when a new democracy has to deal with large scale politically motivated crimes. This challenge is deepened by supporting the TRC's claim that ‘restorative justice’ is embodied in central aspects of its work. In terms of social justice and the TRC, tensions arising from the TRC's focus on a relatively small group of victims are acknowledged. On the other hand, the links between democratisation and aspects of the TRC process are clarified and a one‐sided, ‘material...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.