Abstract

The effect of preemptive therapy on indirect sequelae associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) in liver-transplant recipients has not been clearly delineated. Thirteen years of outcome with the use of preemptive therapy were assessed in a cohort of 216 consecutive liver-transplant recipients. The incidence of major infections (31% vs. 44.3%), bacterial infections (31% vs. 39.2%), bacteremia (19% vs. 29.1%), or fungal infections (3.4% vs. 7.6%) did not differ significantly for patients with CMV infection who received preemptive therapy compared with those who never developed CMV infection and did not receive antiviral prophylaxis for CMV (P>0.20 for all variables). The rate of opportunistic infections also did not differ when patients were stratified by primary CMV infection, reactivation infection, or no CMV infection. Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis occurred in 55.6% of the patients with CMV treated with preemptive therapy and 49.8% of those without CMV infection (P>0.20). The probability of survival at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, and 3 years was also comparable for the two groups. Liver-transplant recipients with CMV infection, including high-risk R-/D+ patients, when followed using the preemptive therapy approach had no significant difference in meaningful outcomes such as opportunistic superinfections, HCV recurrence rates, rejection, and survival when compared with the patients in whom CMV infection never developed and who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis for CMV.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call