Abstract
In general, the competition was fair, if done honestly but the competition was not always done honestly. The fraudulent acts one of which was the cartel. Cartels were agreements made by businesses to other businesses in similar production to influence prices and production process. The cartel action usually choose products that have strategic value, as well as production of meat and soy. In the production of strategic community such as meat and soy currently were alleged (indication) the occurence of a cartel. To avoid these allegations, to marketing, production businesses must leave the Antimonopoly Law No.5/1999. Where in the legislation there was a ban on cartel action by businesses that contained in Article 11 of the law. However, the setting of the cartel was still considered less clear and complete, because it does not provide clear and unequivocal definition of the cartel as well as the type of the cartel. To avoid the vagueness of the norm government in formulating laws and should be careful and able to provide legal protection of a clear and unequivocal to the consumer to prevent arbitrary actions of businesses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
