Abstract

This contribution addresses key issues around the application of Indigenous knowledge in contexts where such knowledge is neither generated nor held (academy, industry, governments, etc.). Effective models for the ethical incorporation of Indigenous knowledge into environmental governance in Canada have remained elusive despite decades of attempts. The predominant research paradigm of “incorporating” Indigenous knowledge into environmental governance is one of extraction by the external interests who seek to include specific aspects of such knowledge in their undertakings. This approach continues to fail because Indigenous knowledge exists as an integral component of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS). It is often hollow and potentially damaging to consider any knowledge without understanding the societal systems and peoples that produced it. Indigenous knowledge is not just “knowledge” (a noun) but a way of life, something that must be lived (a verb) in order to be understood. Indigenous knowledge is inseparable from the people who hold and live this knowledge. Although government policy and legislation have evolved in attempts to treat Indigenous knowledge more holistically, the overriding paradigm of extraction remains essentially unchanged. Even the most recent frameworks will meet with limited success as a result. Appropriate and effective inclusion of Indigenous knowledge requires recognition of the systems that support it, which in turn necessitates support for Indigenous self-determination.

Highlights

  • There is no way to quantify a way of life, only a way to live it.Winona LaDuke (1999, 132)Anishinaabe scholar/activist Winona LaDuke offered the above insight over two decades ago, yet her remark remains as relevant today as it was

  • This paper addresses key issues around the application of Indigenous knowledge in contexts where such knowledge is neither generated nor held

  • I share Comanche-Nahua scholar Patrisia Gonzales’ concern when she states that “I am most concerned with what happens as our Traditional Ecological Knowledge” (TEK) changes when it is taken out of the spaces and relationships over time that we have developed with our lands, our waters, our medicines” (2020, 85)

Read more

Summary

Deborah McGregor

Osgoode Hall Law School and Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University. This contribution addresses key issues around the application of Indigenous knowledge in contexts where such knowledge is neither generated nor held (academy, industry, governments, etc.). The predominant research paradigm of “incorporating” Indigenous knowledge into environmental governance is one of extraction by the external interests who seek to include specific aspects of such knowledge in their undertakings. This approach continues to fail because Indigenous knowledge exists as an integral component of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS).

Introduction
Extraction by External Interests
Innovations in Respecting the Integrity of IKS
Final Remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.