Abstract
Abstract Monitoring and documenting the progress in communication skills of cochlear implanted (CI) children is important for intervention planning, conduction of evidence-based studies, and reporting parents about their children’s progress. The aim of the present study was to provide reliable indices that may be used to monitor a child’s communication skills progress after CI and to grade his or her performance. The study was carried out on 53 prelingual CI children (28 boys and 25 girls). Their ages ranged from 2.5 to 6 years. They were all of average intelligence and showed no associated disorders. They were all enrolled for verbal auditory training at the Unit of Phoniatrics. The CI children were evaluated postoperatively using the quasi-objective description of communicative ability, following scaling by transformation from the lower stages to the higher stages in communicative performance. This entailed the determination of the levels for auditory performance, receptive and expressive language, speech intelligibility, mode of communication, approximate language age, vocabulary size, and speech sounds perception. After 1 year of implantation, the children were re-evaluated and the levels achieved in each item and on the therapy program were recorded. The subjective impression of improvement was marked as poor, fair, or good, which was determined by the phoniatrician, therapist, and the parents for each child. Expressive language development and speech intelligibility in the presence of marked speech perception are significant indicators for communication skills progress. The indices provided for various degrees of improvement are helpful to conduct evidence-based research, especially in the absence of reliable formal testing.
Highlights
Monitoring and documenting the progress in communication skills of cochlear implanted (CI) children is important for intervention planning, conduction of evidence-based studies, and reporting parents about their children’s progress
Much of the researches, since the beginning of cochlear implants (CIs), have been directed toward documenting the degree and scope of speech and language benefit provided by CIs and evaluating the factors that account for individual differences in outcomes of children undergoing the implants
Previous studies have indicated that in CI children, gains in speech production included a greater range of phonetic features and expanded consonant repertoire development [1,2]
Summary
Monitoring and documenting the progress in communication skills of cochlear implanted (CI) children is important for intervention planning, conduction of evidence-based studies, and reporting parents about their children’s progress. Patients The study was carried out on 53 prelingual CI children (28 boys and 25 girls) Their ages ranged from 2.5 to 6 years. They were all of average intelligence and showed no associated disorders. Methodology The CI children were evaluated postoperatively using the quasi-objective description of communicative ability, following scaling by transformation from the lower stages to the higher stages in communicative performance. This entailed the determination of the levels for auditory performance, receptive and expressive language, speech intelligibility, mode of communication, approximate language age, vocabulary size, and speech sounds perception. Many studies concluded that CI children responses were advantageous as regards receptive and expressive language [10], and that the rates of language growth in the children with implants were very similar to that
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
