Indications for continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring: What do they tell us?

Abstract

ObjectiveWhile studies have explored clinical and EEG predictors of seizures on continuous EEG (cEEG), the role of cEEG indications as predictors of seizures has not been studied. Our study aims to fill this knowledge gap. MethodsWe used the prospective cEEG database at Cleveland Clinic for the 2016 calendar year. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent cEEG for the indication of altered mental status (AMS) and seizure-like events (SLE: motor or patient-reported events) were included. Baseline characteristics and EEG findings were compared between the two groups. Multivariable regression was used to compare the two groups and identify seizure detection risk factors. ResultsOf 2227 patients (mean age 59.4 years) who met the inclusion criteria, 882 (50% females) underwent cEEG for AMS and 1345(51% females) for SLE. SLE patients were younger(OR: 0.988, CI: 0.98–0.99, p < 0.001), had longer monitoring(OR:1.04, CI:1.00–1.07, p = 0.033), were more likely to have epilepsy-related-breakthrough seizures(OR:25.9, CI:0.5.89–115, p < 0.001), psychogenic non-epileptic spells (OR:6.85, CI:1.60–29.3, p = 0.008), were more awake (p < 0.001) and more likely to be on anti-seizure medications(OR:1.60, CI:1.29–1.98, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, SLE was an independent predictor of seizure detection (OR: 2.60, CI: 1.77–3.88, p < 0.001). SignificanceOur findings highlight the differences in patients undergoing cEEG for AMS vs. SLE. SLE as a cEEG indication represents an independent predictor of seizures on cEEG and, therefore, deserves special attention. Future multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings.