Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation of newborn has been practiced for several years with advances in many ways. As compared to the western world, neonatal ventilation in our country started in recent years.Subjects, Methods and Results: A retrospective chart review was conducted to analyze the common indications and outcome of neonates requiring mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care unit at Ad-Din Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013. Fifty eight neonates were ventilated over a period of 19 months of whom 39 (67.24%) survived. Respiratory distress syndrome was the commonest indication for ventilation (32.75%), followed by Perinatal asphyxia (18.96%), Pneumonia (13.79%), Neonatal Sepsis (13.79%), Meconium aspiration syndrome 6(10.16%) & Pneumothorax 6 (10.16%). Among the babies who survived, 35(89.74%) were managed solely with conventional ventilator and 4 babies required both conventional and High Frequency Oscillatory (HFOV) ventilation. Survival rate was higher where birth weight >2500gm (76.19%) and gestational age 34-37 weeks (88.88%). Survival rates was (69.23%) in <30 weeks and 60% in <1000 g. Prolong ventilator support was needed for Respiratory Distress Syndrome without surfactant (mean 254 hrs), Perinatal asphyxia (mean 187hrs) and Neonatal sepsis (mean 187hrs). Common complications were Pneumonia (12.06%), Pneumothorax (10.34%), sepsis (8.6%) & Pulmonary hemorrhage (3.4%). Survival rate was higher in babies requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome (84.21%).Conclusion: Use of surfactant could decrease the duration of ventilation and mortality further in babies with respiratory distress syndrome.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.16(1) 2017 p.24-28

Highlights

  • Before the 1960s newborn infants with severe lung disease, usually due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), had a very high mortality rate 1

  • Survival rate was higher among babies with birth weight >2500g 16 (76.19%) and gestational age 34-37 weeks 8 (88.88%)

  • Respiratory distress syndrome (32.75%) was most common indications for mechanical ventilation which was followed by severe birth asphyxia (18.96%), Pneumonia (13.79%), N. sepsis (13.79%), Pneumothorax (10.16%) and Meconium aspiration syndrome 6 (10.16%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Before the 1960s newborn infants with severe lung disease, usually due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), had a very high mortality rate 1. The decrease in mortality has been even more impressive for very low birth weight infants (< 1500g)[5,6,7] This has been attributed to the increased availability of mechanical ventilation, and more recently the introduction of surfactant and total. 1. Dr Nasim Jahan, Associate Professor, Department of Neonatology, Ad-din Medical college Hospital, Dhaka 2. Methods and Results: A retrospective chart review was conducted to analyze the common indications and outcome of neonates requiring mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care unit at Ad-Din Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013. Prolong ventilator support was needed for Respiratory Distress Syndrome without surfactant (mean 254 hrs), Perinatal asphyxia (mean 187hrs) and Neonatal sepsis (mean 187hrs). Survival rate was higher in babies requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome (84.21%). Conclusion: Use of surfactant could decrease the duration of ventilation and mortality further in babies with respiratory distress syndrome

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.