Abstract

The analysis of the publication of scientific articles, a fundamental link within the research process, has become the standard unit that allows for the assessment of the quality of the knowledge generation process and its impact on the scientific environment. This article aims to describe the general aspects of the relationship between bibliometric studies and decision-making. Data on scientific activities are increasingly being used to govern science. Research evaluations that were once individually designed for their specific context and conducted by peers are now routine and based on metrics. The issue is that the evaluation has shifted from being based on expert assessments to relying on these metrics. The opportunity to apply bibliometric techniques proves useful when making decisions that involve a redirection of all research-development plans and the selection of capable leaders to coordinate projects with the purpose of generating technological and financial resources.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call