India's rise as an Asian power: nation, neighborhood, and region

Abstract

India's Rise as an Asian Power: Nation, Neighborhood, and Region. By Sandy Gordon. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 2015. Softcover: 264pp. Is destined to play the role of a global as many proponents of its rise believe? Or will it remain mired in poverty and corruption, unable to overcome its deep social, economic and political flaws and the shackles of a troubled neighbourhood? India's future prospects have been debated in this manner almost since its independence in 1947, and such debates have only intensified since the late 1990s, when declared its nuclear weapon capability and experienced a period of sustained economic growth. Sandy Gordon, an Australian academic and former public servant, is one of the latest to weigh in. In India's Rise as an Asian Power, Gordon ably documents India's domestic and regional challenges and argues that they could well diminish India's global prospects. He attempts to uncover the interlocking problems of India's domestic pathologies--including pervasive corruption, endemic violence and democratic discontents--with the enmeshed dissonance of India's immediate neighbourhood. Gordon also suggests that these vulnerabilities are being exploited by Great Powers such as China and the forces of globalization, including Islamists. [I]n order fully to realize its potential and emerge as a truly global power, he concludes, India has first to neutralize threats originating in South Asia by concentrating on the domestic and neighbourhood arenas of activity (p. 211). Broad-ranging book-length academic studies about contemporary remain somewhat rare commodities, and Gordon provides useful details for those unfamiliar with the intricacies of Indian politics, security and socio-economic development. Yet the picture he paints of is undeniably grim, and perhaps unduly pessimistic. While admirably wide-ranging, his analysis suffers from two important flaws. The first is the absence of necessary context. The argument that India's rise is hobbled by its domestic weaknesses and neighbourhood dynamics requires either a comparative or historical approach. A comparison would suggest that most major powers in history rose to global prominence despite adverse domestic and neighbourhood conditions. This applies equally to the European colonial powers from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, the Soviet Union and Japan in the early twentieth century and China over the past three decades. Indeed, the United States' emergence in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries--only after the establishment of primacy in its neighbourhood--is rather exceptional. Alternatively, a historical analysis of paints a far more positive picture than Gordon appears willing to concede. Measurable steps have been taken in recent years to ameliorate or mitigate some of India's most significant shortcomings. Terrorist and insurgent violence has steadily declined. The economy has diversified and become more resilient to external shocks. Electoral politics have become more competitive, and good governance is now more likely to be rewarded by the electorate. …