Abstract

BackgroundIndia accounts for 19% of global maternal deaths, three-quarters of which come from nine states. In 2005, India launched a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), to reduce maternal mortality ratio (MMR) through promotion of institutional births. JSY is the largest CCT in the world. In the nine states with relatively lower socioeconomic levels, JSY provides a cash incentive to all women on birthing in health institution. The cash incentive is intended to reduce financial barriers to accessing institutional care for delivery. Increased institutional births are expected to reduce MMR. Thus, JSY is expected to (a) increase institutional births and (b) reduce MMR in states with high proportions of institutional births. We examine the association between (a) service uptake, i.e., institutional birth proportions and (b) health outcome, i.e., MMR.MethodData from Sample Registration Survey of India were analysed to describe trends in proportion of institutional births before (2005) and during (2006–2010) the implementation of the JSY. Data from Annual Health Survey (2010–2011) for all 284 districts in above- mentioned nine states were analysed to assess relationship between MMR and institutional births.ResultsProportion of institutional births increased from a pre-programme average of 20% to 49% in 5 years (p<0.05). In bivariate analysis, proportion of institutional births had a small negative correlation with district MMR (r = −0.11).The multivariate regression model did not establish significant association between institutional birth proportions and MMR [CI: −0.10, 0.68].ConclusionsOur analysis confirmed that JSY succeeded in raising institutional births significantly. However, we were unable to detect a significant association between institutional birth proportion and MMR. This indicates that high institutional birth proportions that JSY has achieved are of themselves inadequate to reduce MMR. Other factors including improved quality of care at institutions are required for intended effect.

Highlights

  • India accounts for 19% of global maternal deaths, three-quarters of which come from nine states

  • This indicates that high institutional birth proportions that Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) has achieved are of themselves inadequate to reduce maternal mortality ratio (MMR)

  • We were unable to detect a significant association between the proportion of institutional births and the MMR at the district level, though other indicators of overall development such as literacy showed a significant association with reduction in the MMR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

India accounts for 19% of global maternal deaths, three-quarters of which come from nine states. In 2005, India launched a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), to reduce maternal mortality ratio (MMR) through promotion of institutional births. In the nine states with relatively lower socioeconomic levels, JSY provides a cash incentive to all women on birthing in health institution. Increased institutional births are expected to reduce MMR. JSY is expected to (a) increase institutional births and (b) reduce MMR in states with high proportions of institutional births. India accounted for 19% of the globally estimated 287 000 maternal deaths in 2010 [1]. In nine other large states, MMR estimates still range between 258 and 390 [3] These nine states account for 62% of maternal deaths in India, and 12% of the global burden of maternal mortality [3]. The world’s progress towards the achievement of MDG 5 is largely dependent on maternal mortality reductions in India, in these nine Indian states

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call