Abstract

Ismat Chughtai’s short story “Quit India” (“Hindustan Chod Do” in Urdu, 1953) represents the relationship between Indians and British colonists and Anglo-Indian Indians by examining the life of Eric William Jackson, a British official in pre-Independence India and an unemployed outcast and displaced person following Independence who lives with his working-class lover Sakku bai, and the narrator’s outlook towards the family. The ex-British official Jackson’s attempt to “Indianize” himself perhaps fails after Independence because he does not seek the desire of the new Indian state in the spaces of business and government like he does in the domestic space of Sakku Bai’s lodgings and in his relationship with her and perhaps also because the narrator and the other citizens of the new Indian state ignore those who are powerless such as the charwoman Sakku bai and the unemployed Jackson. The narrator’s focus on Jackson and Sakku bai’s family seems to indicate, at least partly, a desire to look outside the domestic sphere for mental and spiritual stimulation even though she appears to be a typical domestic goddess. This could be related to the women’s movement’s need for a greater role for women outside the house in pre-Independence and Independent India.

Highlights

  • Need for a greater role for women outside the house in pre-Independence and Independent India

  • Ismat Chughtai’s short story “Quit India” (“Hindustan Chod Do” in Urdu, 1953) represents the relationship between Indians and British colonists and Anglo-Indian Indians by examining the life of Eric William Jackson, a British official in pre-Independence India and an unemployed outcast and displaced person following Independence who lives with his working-class lover Sakku bai in the servants’ quarters of the bungalow which was earlier his official residence, and the narrator’s outlook towards the family

  • It could be examined whether the narrator encourages the reader to think that the “quitting” of India by Jackson is mandatory for India’s independence.The narrator seems to contend that Jackson should have been penalized for his violent actions preceding Independence, even if they were considered the duties of a British official

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Need for a greater role for women outside the house in pre-Independence and Independent India. The narrator appears to look at colonization as an attempt of the “surplus”, unwanted populations of the colonizers’ countries such as Jackson to seek the desire of the colonizers such as the British colonial government that employs Jackson as well as of the colonized such as Sakku bai.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call