Index to Volume 111: Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America
Previous article FreeIndex to Volume 111: Papers of the Bibliographical Society of AmericaPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreSubject entries, whether topical, personal name, or geographical, are set in small capitals. A chronological approach is provided under chronological references. Geographical entries are made for all articles, notes, and reviews treating a subject that can be localized.abolitionism: Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” 513–45abridgement: Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” 1–30Adams, Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, 103–106american anti-slavery society: Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” 513–45americas, the: Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” 203–20analytical bibliography: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101annotation: Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315arber, edward: Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, 379–406archives: Ortega, Élika, review of Earhart, Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of Digital Literary Studies, 424–27Armstrong, Lillian, La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, reviewed, 422–23artists’ books: Vincler, John, review of Bury, Artists’ Books: The Book as a Work of Art 1963–2000, 427–31autograph collecting: Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” 203–20ball, charles: Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” 513–45ballads: Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” 317–44Baron, Sabrina Alcorn, review of Bayman, Thomas Dekker and the Culture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, 255–56bayerische staatsbibliothek: Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” 345–77Bayman, Anna, Thomas Dekker and the Cuture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, reviewed, 255–56beaumont, francis: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315bibliographical indexes, catalogues, and lists: Dunne, Derek, review of Freeman, Bibliotheca Fictiva: A Collection of Books & Manuscripts Relating to Literary Forgery, 263–67; Gehl, Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, 107–9; Vincler, John, review of Bury, Artists’ Books: The Book as a Work of Art 1963–2000, 427–31Bibliographical Society of America 2017 Annual Meeting Minutes, Reports, and Society By-Laws, 549–78“bibliotheca universalis”: Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68blagden, cyprian: Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, 379–406Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, reviewed, 379–406bodleian library: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315book auctions: Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” 345–77book collecting: Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” 241–53; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315book history: Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” 317–44book trade: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; Milevski, Robert J., review of Garlock, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, 109–116bookbinding: Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” 143–65; Milevski, Robert J., review of Garlock, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, 109–116bookplates: Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” 241–53booksellers: Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” 345–77bookshops: Wilson, Nicola, review of Osborne, The Rise of the Modernist Bookshop: Books and the Commerce of Culture in the Twenteith Century, 267–70Bourus, Terri, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, reviewed, 257–63bowers, fredson: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315Brewer, David A., review of Loveman, Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability, 1660–1703, 415–19Bristow, John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” 221–40brome, alexander: Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” 469–89brome, richard: Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” 469–89bullen, a. h.: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” 287–315Burrows, Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, 257–63Bury, Stephen, Artists’ Books: The Book as a Work of Art 1963–2000, reviewed, 427–31butter, nathaniel: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101caesar, “commentaries”: Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” 1–30canada: McEvilla, Joshua J., review of Dair, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, 271–74; Milevski, Robert J., review of Garlock, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, 109–116Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84cartwright, william: Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” 469–89cataloguing: Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68; Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” 143–65; Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” 345–77catesby, mark: Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” 1–30chaucer, geoffrey: Skinner, Julia, review of Kerby-Fulton, Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, 120–122cheap repository, the: Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” 317–44chicano/a literature: Noorda, Rachel, review of Martín-Rodríguez, ed., With a Book in Their Hands: Chicano/a Readers and Readerships Across the Centuries, 117–120chisolm, colin: Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, 491–511chronological references:Medieval: Skinner, Julia, review of Kerby-Fulton, Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, 120–12215th century: Gehl, Paul, review of La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” century: Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68; Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Gehl, Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, Sabrina Alcorn, review of Bayman, Thomas Dekker and the Culture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, century: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; David A., review of Loveman, Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability, 1660–1703, Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” review of and Early Modern century: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” century: Ian, review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, 257–63; for the The and of Book Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” century: John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; McEvilla, Joshua J., review of Dair, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, 271–74; Milevski, Robert J., review of Garlock, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, Noorda, Rachel, review of Martín-Rodríguez, ed., With a Book in Their Hands: Chicano/a Readers and Readerships Across the Centuries, Vincler, John, review of Bury, Artists’ Books: The Book as a Work of Art 1963–2000, Wilson, Nicola, review of Osborne, The Rise of the Modernist Bookshop: Books and the Commerce of Culture in the Twenteith Century, “ in the of the on the of Provenance,” John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; for the The and of Book Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Ian, review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, 257–63; Dunne, Derek, review of Freeman, Bibliotheca Fictiva: A Collection of Books & Manuscripts Relating to Literary Forgery, Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, McEvilla, Joshua J., review of Dair, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, reviewed, Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” of John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” Sabrina Alcorn, review of Bayman, Thomas Dekker and the Culture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, Ortega, Élika, review of Earhart, Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of Digital Literary Studies, review of and Early Modern Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” of and Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Derek, review of Freeman, Bibliotheca Fictiva: A Collection of Books & Manuscripts Relating to Literary Forgery, 263–67; review of and Books and Manuscripts from the and Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” alexander: Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of Digital Literary Studies, reviewed, and Starza Smith, eds., Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, reviewed, Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, 257–63; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Ortega, Élika, review of Earhart, Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of Digital Literary Studies, Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Gehl, Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, 107–9; Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” on the Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68; Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; review of and Early Modern Wagner, Bettina, Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” of Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” in Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” library: Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Dunne, Derek, review of Freeman, Bibliotheca Fictiva: A Collection of Books & Manuscripts Relating to Literary Forgery, 263–67; Dunne, Derek, review of and Books and Manuscripts from the and 263–67; Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” Bibliotheca Fictiva: A Collection of Books & Manuscripts Relating to Literary Forgery, reviewed, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, reviewed, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, 107–9; review of La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” review of and Early Modern Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” books: for the The and of Book alexander: Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” ed., and Books and Manuscripts from the and reviewed, the Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” of the Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, library: Gehl, Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Gehl, Paul, review of La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Gehl, Paul, review of La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” william: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” william: Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, reviewed, Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” charles: Ian, review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, richard: John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, reviewed, Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” 445–68; Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” for the The and of Book for the The and of Book Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Sabrina Alcorn, review of Bayman, Thomas Dekker and the Culture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; David A., review of Loveman, Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability, 1660–1703, John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability, 1660–1703, reviewed, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” 143–65; Gehl, Paul F., review of Reynolds, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, 107–9; Skinner, Julia, review of Kerby-Fulton, Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, of Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” 241–53; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” M., ed., With a Book in Their Hands: Chicano/a Readers and Readerships Across the Centuries, reviewed, Joshua J., review of Dair, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, Robert J., review of Garlock, Canadian Binders’ Tickets and Booksellers’ Labels, Brittany, review of Eckhardt and Starza Smith, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England, Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” Wilson, Nicola, review of Osborne, The Rise of the Modernist Bookshop: Books and the Commerce of Culture in the Twenteith Century, Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” and Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” library: Wagner, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” of a Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” of and the Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” Rachel, review of Martín-Rodríguez, ed., With a Book in Their Hands: Chicano/a Readers and Readerships Across the Centuries, Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” Élika, review of Earhart, Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of Digital Literary Studies, ed., The Rise of the Modernist Bookshop: Books and the Commerce of Culture in the Century, reviewed, Sabrina Alcorn, review of Bayman, Thomas Dekker and the Culture of Pamphleteering in Early Modern England, Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Blair, Ann, “The Capacious Bibliographical Practice of Conrad Gessner,” Skinner, Julia, review of Kerby-Fulton, Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” for the The and of Book Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” for the The and of Book Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” history: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” 143–65; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” “ in the of the on the of Provenance,” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” history: Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” 31–60; for the The and of Book Nicosia, Marissa, “Printing as Revival: Making Playbooks in the 1650s,” Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” trade: John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” 167–84; Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” 185–202; Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” David A., review of Loveman, Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability, 1660–1703, Noorda, Rachel, review of Martín-Rodríguez, ed., With a Book in Their Hands: Chicano/a Readers and Readerships Across the Centuries, Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, “ in the of the on the of Provenance,” Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library at Holkham Hall, vol. 1: Manuscripts from Italy to 1500, part 1: Shelfmarks 1–399, reviewed, a. John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” of Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” and Early Modern reviewed, Carmassi, Patrizia, “Through the Hands of Librarians and Booksellers: Examples of Recent Changes in Medieval Manuscripts of German Collections,” Jung, Sandro, “Robert Morison’s Collections of Extracts, The General Magazine, and the Reprinting of Illustrations,” william: Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; Ian, review of Bourus, Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet, 257–63; review of Lesser, Hamlet After Q1: An Uncanny History of the Shakespearean Text, 257–63; Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Julia, review of Kerby-Fulton, Thompson, and Baechle, eds., New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” in the Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Peiser, Megan, “Reviews as Database: Reading the Review Periodical in Eighteenth-Century England, Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” Stoker, David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Gadd, Ian, “A Companion to Blayney,” review of Blayney, The Stationers’ Company and the Printers of London, 1501–1557, Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” David, “The Later Years of the Cheap Repository,” Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” Blayney, Peter W. M., “Quadrat Demonstrandum,” review of Vickers, The One “King Lear,” 61–101; McEvilla, Joshua J., review of Dair, Epistles to the Torontonians, With Articles from Canadian Printer & Publisher, Gatch, Milton McC., “Disappearing Ess/Phillipps Manuscripts,” for the The and of Book Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” The One “King Lear,” reviewed, John, review of Bury, Artists’ Books: The Book as a Work of Art 1963–2000, Bettina, “ ‘Duplum Bibliothecae regiae Monacensis’: The Munich Court Library and its Book Auctions in the Nineneteenth Century,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Lupić, Ivan, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch, “ ‘What stuff is here?” Edmond Malone and the 1778 Edition of Beaumont and Fletcher,” Suarez, Michael F., S. J., “Hard Cases: Confronting Bibliographical Difficulty in Eighteenth-Century Texts,” and Samuels Lasner, Mark, “A Collector Reflects on Provenance,” John, and Rebecca N. Mitchell, “The Provenance of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Decay of Lying’,” Roy, Michaël, “The Vanishing Slave: Publishing the Narrative of Charles Ball, from Slavery in America (1836) to Fifty Years in Chains (1858),” Nicola, review of Osborne, The Rise of the Modernist Bookshop: Books and the Commerce of Culture in the Twenteith Century, Gehl, Paul, review of La xilografia nel libro italiano del Quattrocento: un percorso tra gli incunaboli del Seminario Vescovile di Padova, Duroselle-Melish, Caroline, “Anatomy of a Pamphlet Collection: From Disbinding to Reuniting,” Crackel, Theodore J., V. Fredrick Rickey, and Joel S. Silverberg, “Provenance Lost? George Washington’s Books and Papers Lost, Found, and (on occasion) Lost Again,” Previous article The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America Volume 2017 for the Bibliographical Society of America 2017 the Bibliographical Society of
- Research Article
- 10.1353/pgn.2017.0065
- Jan 1, 2017
- Parergon
Reviewed by: New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall eds. Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, John J. Thompson, and Sarah Baechle Stephanie Downes Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, John J. Thompson, and Sarah Baechle, eds, New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 2014; cloth; pp. 576; R.R.P. US $66.00; ISBN 9780268033279. In 2012, at the International Medieval Studies Congress in Kalamazoo, I accepted a lift to the annual Chaucer Review dinner with illustrious and highly appropriate company: Martha Driver was in the driver's seat; Derek Pearsall was giving directions. This was not my first meeting with Derek, but it was the perfect showcase of the intelligence, warmth, humour, and passion that often comes across in his writing and is still more striking on encountering him in person: my fellow passenger was preparing a translation of Beowulf into Turkish, which Derek quizzed him on so enthusiastically that his dedication to reaching our destination lapsed. The route we finally took to our destination may not have been the most direct, but the experience was as entertaining as it was educative. Derek Pearsall's reputation as a scholar in the field of medieval English literary and manuscript studies is well established. This collection, edited by Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, John J. Thompson and Sarah Baechle, is the second assemblage of essays to have been published 'in honor' of Derek's work: the first was a collection titled Middle English Poetry: Texts and Traditions, edited by A.J. Minnis for York Medieval Press in 2001. The editors of this new collection have clearly attempted not only to do justice to Pearsall's long and important career, but to produce the definitive celebration of its achievements: in over 500 pages and 7 'parts', 24 chapters consider various aspects of medieval English literary studies, from Chaucer, Langland and Lydgate, to studies of manuscript culture and audience reception, both medieval and modern. Martha Driver's analytical portrait of 'Derek Pearsall, Secret Shakespearean', emphasizes the 'remarkable breadth' of Pearsall's knowledge, and pulls the reader into what he himself has long recognized as the inherent medievalness of Shakespeare's world. Chapters by A. C. Spearing, A. I. Doyle, Julia Boffey, A. S. G. Edwards, Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, Jill Mann, and others, further reinforce not only Pearsall's status within the field, but the volume's own contribution to it. [End Page 222] That this tome is intended not just as a celebration of Pearsall's career but as a contribution to the field whose current form he himself helped shape is clearly indicated in the 'new directions' of the title. In this sense, the book looks forward, at the same time as it looks back. Like any good festschrift, this balance between the idea of a legacy——and of what has been accomplished within a given individual's field——and the future——where the same field might now be headed——is carefully maintained. The names of more familiar and well established scholars——Susan Powell, Sarah McNamer, Carol M. Meale, to name but a few——appear alongside those of a next generation of critics. This is a book which is about influence: Pearsall's own influence on criticism in the field in general, but also his influence on individual scholars, their subjects, and their scholarly methods. It addresses some of the crucial issues with which students and researchers work, such as scribal and reception practices, including the copying and handling of specific manuscripts, as well as the legacy and influence of certain texts and authors on both the field and its objects. A problem with the genre of festschrift writing is that it can tend to celebrate and perpetuate a particular intellectual and scholarly history uncritically, without reflecting on a field's gaps and inadequacies. New Directions clearly aims to respond to that concern with essays on very contemporary concerns in manuscript studies, including scribal and reading cultures, multilingualism, and various forms of medievalism and medievalist reception. While the collection still doesn't offer the reader a clear sense of where these 'new directions' might be headed...
- Research Article
- 10.7227/lh.17.1.7
- May 1, 2008
- Literature & History
Reviews: Northern English: A Social and Cultural History, Foxe's ‘Book of Martyrs' and Early Modern Print Culture, Food in Early Modern England: Phases, Fads, Fashions 1500–1760, Domestic Life and Domestic Tragedy in Early Modern England: The Material Life of the Household, Shakespeare's Histories and Counter Histories, the Uses of History in Early Modern England, Women and the Pamphlet Culture of
- Research Article
- 10.1086/690606
- Mar 1, 2017
- The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America
Previous articleNext article FreeBook ReviewsKerby-Fulton, Kathryn, John J. Thompson, and Sarah Baechle, eds. New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014. Hardback, 576 pp. $66.00. (ISBN: 978-0-268-03327-9).Julia SkinnerJulia Skinner Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThis book grew out of a conference that, as the name suggests, was held to celebrate Derek Pearsall’s contributions to the field of medieval manuscript studies and offer some current research while encouraging contributors and readers to consider how the field might grow in the future. The book is divided topically into several sections, which are sufficiently broad to cover the subjects each author addresses.The book’s coverage of late medieval manuscript history is ambitious, but the editors have compiled the essays into thematic groupings that make sense and included forwards for each that guide the reader to see the connections between some very disparate research topics. Parts 1 and 2 of the book directly address Pearsall’s professional legacy, with discussions of Pearsallian reading practices and courtly verse, while later sections offer analysis of the field’s development and future directions. Part 3 explores medieval manuscript studies as a discipline. It is particularly exciting because it does so by taking several scholars who were present at the 1981 manuscript studies conference Pearsall organized in York and asking them to revisit the work they presented at that conference and how it relates (or does not relate) to the work they are doing today. Parts 4 and 5 discuss new research directions through the lens of author identity: the former focuses on regional and individual scribal identity, while the latter focuses on women, children, and literacy. The next section is devoted to Chaucer, particularly Chaucerian reading practices, and the depth with which contributors explored this area of Chaucer studies was a welcome addition to the volume. It is hardly surprising to see Chaucer appear in a volume on English manuscript history, but it was wonderful to see his work explored by four different authors (not including the forward). The book concludes with another exploration of a single author’s legacy, this time with William Langland. The essays throughout are thoughtful and well written, and include plenty of footnotes for those seeking a deeper dive into the content. The book also includes occasional manuscript images to accompany the essays, as well as an index of manuscripts and incunabula in addition to the general index.While the subject matter is diverse, the book is still narrowly focused enough to serve as a specialized research text. Geographically, the book focuses on English manuscript history, although a few other countries are represented. The title leads one to believe that it would have more international coverage, making it a survey of the newest research and suggestions for future research directions within this subject area. I was pleased with the focus on England, because it allowed the editors to explore the latest research within a contextual umbrella that brings some continuity to readers who are not experts in English history, but with enough meat to appeal to those who are (and of course, this focus makes sense in light of Pearsall’s research interests).The book is rather strictly focused on manuscripts and their production, use, and interpretation by contemporaries and modern scholars. This of course makes sense, although the teacher and book historian in me wished that it had contextualized medieval manuscript history within the broader scope of book history, and I think would require some additional contextualization if used with students just beginning to grapple with these concepts. While its primary focus is on medieval manuscripts, it does offer a bit of context by including some discussion of the time periods that directly bookend the medieval period (for example, several essays consider early modern history).Because it considers a rather thorough survey of one particular time period and item type, it is a good complement to studies across the fields of book history and bibliography. I have been interested lately in readers and reading, and so found the sections on Chaucerian and post-Chaucerian reading practices and women, children, and literacy to be particularly helpful for deepening my knowledge of reading practices within the context of medieval and early modern history.While the book is applicable for instructors, it seems directed towards other scholars in this area. Terms and concepts are not always defined, suggesting an intended audience that is familiar with medieval manuscript studies. The forwards to each section of the book offer useful framing of the subjects covered and encourage readers to think about how the contents of the book can be applied to research outside the book. This felt especially true with the forward to section 1, which offered Pearsall’s deep, thoughtful approach in juxtaposition to trends towards surface reading.Overall I was very impressed with this book, and enjoyed brushing up on current scholarship through the lens of more deeply understanding one scholar’s contributions and their far-reaching effects. It is an excellent overview of current trends in English manuscript history research and would feel at home on the bookshelf complementing more general surveys of the field. Perhaps most critically, the book allows readers to see the development of this research area as a whole, complemented by essays from researchers within the discipline talking about how their work has grown and changed, but continues to be informed by their early research and interactions with Pearsall. I would recommend it to researchers interested in deepening their knowledge in the area of medieval manuscript studies, as well as to those looking to learn more about Pearsall’s work and influence. Notes Julia Skinner (Bentley Rare Book Gallery, 385 Cobb Avenue NW, MD 1704, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144) is Rare Books Curator at Kennesaw State University, and author of Modernizing Markham (Candle Light Press, 2012). She teaches in the history of food, publishing, and libraries, and has built a robust outreach and community engagement program between the rare book gallery and the greater Atlanta area. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America Volume 111, Number 1March 2017 Published for the Bibliographical Society of America Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/690606 © 2017 by the Bibliographical Society of America. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
- Research Article
- 10.33137/rr.v46i2.42290
- Jan 10, 2024
- Renaissance and Reformation
The present article explores how William Shakespeare’s King Lear thoughtfully challenges the primacy of sight among the senses, with implications for our understanding of the play’s relationship both to its immediate political context and to the history of ocularcentrism in early modern England. Adopting a new historicist approach, this article claims that writing King Lear in the midst of heated debates on the Anglo-Scottish Union was both a reaction to any possible ocularcentric behaviour by King James and a part of active criticism against the ocularcentrism of the period. Regardless of his personal opinion on James’s plan for the Union, Shakespeare was worried that the king would act according to his ocularcentric understanding of the two countries under his rule. Therefore, King Lear can be read as an advance warning to King James, who needs to be wary of superficial, sight-centred behaviours so as not to suffer the same fate as Lear.
- Research Article
- 10.1353/pgn.2015.0085
- Jan 1, 2015
- Parergon
Reviewed by: Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England ed. by Joshua Eckhardt and Daniel Starza Smith Nicholas D. Brodie Eckhardt, Joshua, and Daniel Starza Smith, eds, Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England (Material Readings in Early Modern Culture), Farnham, Ashgate, 2014; hardback; pp. 270; 13 b/w illustrations; R.R.P. £65.00; ISBN 9781472420275. Like many a miscellany, this volume contains a fascinating selection of texts. In the Introduction, the editors, Joshua Eckhardt and Daniel Starza Smith, chart [End Page 288] the history of the term ‘miscellany’ and the phenomenon of miscellanies, and address some of the main scholarly uses of manuscript miscellanies. In short, miscellanies have been used for literary, historiographical, and palaeographical studies of individual texts and authors, but more recently a shift has occurred to examining miscellanies as whole volumes, exploring their varied meanings for authors, compilers, multiple owners, and varied readers. The volume largely builds on this approach of studying miscellanies in the whole, oftentimes in tandem with other texts. Smith’s essay sets straight to this task, studying how its constituent parts become incorporated into a miscellany volume, focusing on textual materiality before, during, and after compilation. He examines manuscripts, folds, handwriting, and the like to reconstruct a potential original manuscript of John Donne’s Satyrs. Smith poses thoughtful questions about whether and when miscellany texts were the termination of a circulating text. Continuing the focus on Donne, Piers Brown explores the term ‘Rhapsody’, and unsettles too-confident definitions of what constituted a miscellany, as opposed to other definable textual collections like anthology. This also provides a means of looking for order within the apparent disorder of a miscellany, and the treatment of contemporary quotation habits in this essay is particularly interesting. James Daybell’s contribution unpacks notions of letter-writing and model letters. He posits that such letters were not necessarily for simple copying, but were often intended to be politically constructive and personally informative, and to provide moral formation and some basic education. Noah Millstone’s study of prophetic texts highlights the problems of reading such prophecies, both for scholars and for contemporaries. Demonstrating contemporary cynicism and fascination interacting with such texts, Millstone offers some bold conclusions. Helen Hackett’s study of Huntington Library, MS MH 904 offers a convincing attribution of the ‘Hand B Scribe’, and will be of interest to scholars of English recusants. Hackett also provides a detailed survey of how one volume changed over time, with a formerly quite domestic text reconfigured by the deliberate filling of blank pages. Complementing Hackett’s contribution, Cedric C. Brown examines three manuscript miscellanies to map out connections relating to recusant networks and the activities of the Jesuit missioner William Smith, vere Southerne, and extend earlier work about Catholic networks. Lara M. Crowley takes an intriguing approach to the issue of writers’ canons, noting that manuscript miscellanies often contain apocryphal and non-canonical works, and uses this fact to develop a wider view of the possibilities offered to explore contemporary readings. Crowley thus moves from staid scholarly assumptions about scribal idiocy or incompetency, and [End Page 289] copying chains that replicate mistakes, to being more open to the possibilities that dubious attributions may be authentic and, more importantly, were seen that way by contemporaries. Following the theme of scribal copying, Joel Swann challenges simplistic interpretations of the relationship between text and scribe, to explore issues of intent and varied reading patterns and habits. Continuing the scribal focus, Eckhardt explores one scribe’s discernible oscillation between serious and satirical material, highlighting the need to be sensitive to the literary aesthetics and abilities of scribes. Finally, Victoria E. Burke concludes with a focus on the aesthetic tastes of one particular compiler. In this case study, Donne’s popularity, the theme of moderation, classical excerpts, and the compiler’s personal interest in sounds, all provide insights into the changing tastes of one individual reader, firmly concluding the volume with an illustration of the benefits to be had from studying medieval miscellanies in the whole. Overall, this volume contains a delightful selection of essays. It will be of interest to scholars with particular interests like Donne or English recusants, who might choose the pages related to...
- Research Article
- 10.7227/lh.14.1.6
- May 1, 2005
- Literature & History
Reviews: The Logic of History: Putting Postmodernism in Perspective, on the Future of History: The Postmodernist Challenge and its Aftermath, Modernism and the Ideology of History: Literature, Politics, and the Past, Postmodernism in History: Fear or Freedom?, Quoting Shakespeare: Form and Culture in Early Modern Drama, Early Modern Civil Discourses, ‘A moving Rhetoricke’: Gender and Silence in Early Modern England,
- Research Article
- 10.1353/sac.2017.0069
- Jan 1, 2017
- Studies in the Age of Chaucer
Reviewed by: New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall ed. by Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, John J. Thompson, and Sarah Baechle Elon Lang Kathryn Kerby-Fulton, John J. Thompson, and Sarah Baechle, eds. New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014. Pp. xxii, 551. $66.00. This volume of twenty-four essays is the latest and also grandest example of commemorative essay collections, deservedly dedicated to Derek Pearsall. The collection builds upon Pearsall's own work establishing the York Manuscripts Conference in the early 1980s. This conference and its successor at Harvard gave birth to some of the most acclaimed contemporary scholarship on medieval manuscripts and literature: including volumes such as Manuscripts and Texts: Editorial Problems in Later Middle English Literature (D. S. Brewer, 1987) and New Directions in Later Medieval Manuscript Studies (York Medieval Press, 2000)—both edited by Pearsall—and several collections of essays dedicated to Pearsall, such as Medieval Literature and Historical Inquiry (D. S. Brewer, 2000) and Middle English Poetry: Texts and Traditions (York Medieval Press, 2001). The way this book of New Directions is different from the earlier festschrifts and collections, however, is how deeply the feted honoree's presence is felt throughout the volume. Rather than just offering an appreciative and celebratory introduction and a dignified photo facing the title page, the volume's editors help to map out its contents for readers with prefaces to thematic section groupings that all illustrate Pearsall's legacy helping to link medieval literary studies and book history. As a tip-of-the-hat to Pearsall's role in establishing this standard of textuality-awareness, Part 1 of the book is titled "Celebrating Pearsallian [End Page 343] Reading Practices," in which Tony Spearing leads off with an article that builds upon Pearsall's work on Troilus and Criseyde. Spearing does so by examining Chaucer's major contribution to Middle English narrative verse, i.e., overt narrative markers of the author's participation in a tale's retelling, through the lens of narrative theorists such as Gérard Genette and Gary Saul Morson. In this, Spearing further fleshes out his concept of "autography," illustrating how it can be understood as a reaction against earlier forms of retelling existing stories. In her "Derek Pearsall, Secret Shakespearean" Martha Driver offers a metacritical piece that combs back through Pearsall's curriculum vitae. Drawing on metacritism in another vein, Part 2 of the volume is as much a memorial to Pearsall's esteemed colleague at York, Elizabeth Salter, as it is a celebration of Pearsall himself. Essays from Jocelyn Wogan-Browne on affective reading in two meditations on Christ's Passion, Susan Powell on Wynnere and Wastoure's connection to the Wing-field family of mid-fourteenth-century Suffolk, Katie Ann-Marie Bugyis on strategies used by the Red-Ink Annotator of The Book of Margery Kempe, and Sarah McNamer on the place of origin and Franciscan affiliation of the author of the Italian Meditations on the Life of Christ all pay homage to the enduring work Salter produced to ground Middle English literature in its international, textual, and historical contexts. To demonstrate further the influence of Pearsall's effort to invigorate the field of literary studies with manuscript studies, Part 3 of the collection is positioned as a celebration of the thirty-year anniversary of the 1981 York Manuscripts conference. Carol Meale, for example, shows how her career-spanning interest in the book trade in London is built on the work she developed for that conference on early sixteenth-century bookseller and collector John Colyns. In her new essay, she reads Colyns's network of influence on cultural history even more deeply in an exploration of an important group of printers and book-dealers with whom Colyns gathered at Norwich in 1526. Other contributions in this section include A. S. G. Edwards's study on the cost and trade in Lydgate manuscripts in the twentieth century, A. I. Doyle's study on what can be learned about readers from marginalia in a single...
- Research Article
- 10.31273/eirj.v1i2.90
- Mar 30, 2014
- Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal
On 27 July 2012, in his judgment following ‘The Twitter Joke Trial’, the Lord Chief Justice of England & Wales quoted from King Lear (Folio). The trial was the first time a British Court had considered the use of Twitter in the context of a bomb hoax. The judgment was hailed as ‘a victory for common sense’, reversing decisions of two lower courts. It now provides authority against similar prosecutions. This paper argues that the use of a four-hundred-year-old Shakespearean text in negotiating modern legal principles is of considerable cultural significance – both through using the familiar to respond to the new – and by invoking Shakespeare’s voice within the powerful social mechanism of the law courts. It also considers the advantages and disadvantages of literary allusions within legal proceedings, contrasting these two widely reported judgments.This piece is adapted from a transcript of: King Lear, Twitter and the Da Vinci Code given as part of the Sidelights on Shakespeare lecture series at University of Warwick on 29 November 2013.Professor Gary Watt provides a response to Curtis's critical reflection, considering judicial allusion as logic or ornament. Image: Cordelia in the Court of King Lear, Sir John Gilbert (1873)
- Research Article
- 10.1353/cjm.2012.0059
- Jan 1, 2012
- Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies
Reviewed by: Rhetorics of Bodily Disease and Health in Medieval and Early Modern England Dan Mills Jennifer C. Vaught, Rhetorics of Bodily Disease and Health in Medieval and Early Modern England (Surrey, UK: Ashgate 2010) 243 pp., ill. Jennifer Vaught’s new collection, Rhetorics of Bodily Disease and Health in Medieval and Early Modern England, includes ten essays that engage with canonical and non-canonical sixteenth- and seventeenth-century texts in the context of their depictions of disease rhetoric. The authors of these essays are very prominent early modern literary critics and their essays demonstrate, firstly, their expertise with the texts they discuss, and secondly, very illuminating examinations of how these texts expose “rhetorics” of illness and disease. Moreover, these potentially arcane analyses of yet another literary trend lead to a much more important understanding of early modernity. As Vaught mentions in her introduction, “writers from antiquity to early modernity often created bodily metaphors, analogies, and allegories demonstrating links they perceived between the microcosm and macrocosm” (6). Indeed, the essays collected in this volume do a fine job illustrating how these literary devices reflected greater concerns beyond those of the literature and literary circles in early modern England. In light of the increasing interest in monstrosity and monstrous births in early modern literary studies, this volume is timely and a must-read for anyone working in these sub-fields as well as for anyone interested in new developments in scholarship on major literary texts. Vaught has divided the ten essays in this collection into four parts, the first of which is entitled “Reading the Instructive Language of the Body in the Middle Ages.” In the first essay of this section, “Episcopal Antinomies of the Early Middle Ages,” Lisi Oliver and Maria Mahoney examine anatomy in the early medieval world through the writings of St. Ambrose and Hrabanus Maurus. Next to the ideas of these clerics, Oliver and Mahoney examine approaches to describing the body from physical and spiritual perspectives. As is the case with many of the essays in this collection, this article successfully negotiates the connection between inner worlds of subjectivity and their manifestations in outer appearance. In “‘This Disfigured People’: Representation of Sin as Pathological Bodily and Mental Affliction in Dante’s Inferno XXIX–XXX,” James Nohrnberg engages with the inner/outer motif in a brief section of Dante’s Inferno by arguing that “leprosy is a figure for all sin, and fever is a symptom of a host of potentially mortal diseases. Thus Dante’s comparison re-licenses a common enough medieval reading of physical ills as symptomatic or moral ones” (48). Nohrnberg shows great facility in close reading this very brief section of the Inferno, and the essay demonstrates greater significance than merely literary analysis in its discussion of moral theories contemporary to Dante. In “‘My body to warente ...’: Linguistic Corporeality in Chaucer’s Pardoner,” Laila Abdalla argues that “Through the body and linguistic performance of the Pardoner, Chaucer debates whether a mal-intentioned but eloquent speaker may nevertheless be a vehicle for the numinous message” and analyzes this within the context of Augustinian hermeneutics of “language meaning and body” (65, 66). Together these three essays do a fine job introducing the reader to the legacy of “disease rhetoric” left before the early modern period began in England. The essays in part 2, “Imaginative Discourses of Sexuality, Delightful and Dangerous,” address the early modern reception of sexualized healthy bodies (12). In “Spenser’s Crowd of Cupids and the Language of Pleasure,” Spenserian [End Page 294] William Oram argues that a specific stanza in Edmund Spenser’s Epithalamion “is at once an attempt to valorize sexual pleasure, and to demonstrate how poetry concerned with sexual love can nonetheless remain chaste” (88). In “Cordelia’s Can’t: Rhetorics of Reticence and (Dis)ease in King Lear,” feminist critic Emma L. Rees argues that in Lear, “Cordelia’s inability to speak in the face of her father’s direct entreaty is ... problematical [because] in the world of the play, soma, psyche, and language are imbricated in a taxingly provocative relationship such that (dis)ease in both microcosm and macrocosm is the only logical outcome of the tragedy” (105, Rees...
- Research Article
- 10.1086/685221
- Dec 1, 2015
- Renaissance Quarterly
Manuscript Miscellanies in Early Modern England. Joshua Eckhardt and Daniel Starza Smith, eds. Material Readings in Early Modern Culture. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2014. xviii + 252 pp. $119.95. - Volume 68 Issue 4
- Research Article
- 10.1353/pgn.2012.0145
- Jan 1, 2012
- Parergon
Reviewed by: Memory's Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England by Jennifer Summit Toby Burrows Summit, Jennifer , Memory's Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2008; cloth; pp. x, 343; 8 b/w illustrations; R.R.P. US$35.00; ISBN 9780226781716. The Act against Superstitious Books and Images (1550) ordered the public destruction of all medieval service books that had survived the dissolution of the English monasteries during the previous decade. Though a majority of medieval manuscripts were indeed destroyed, some still managed to survive into the post-Reformation period. Jennifer Summit is interested in the fate of these medieval books in early modern England, seen especially in the context of the history of libraries. She focuses on the period between 1431 and 1631, stretching from the collecting activities of Humfrey, Duke of Gloucester, to the equally influential work of Sir Robert Cotton. Disclaiming 'a general history of libraries' as her goal, she proceeds through close readings of texts written by a number of important figures of this period: John Lydgate, Thomas More, Thomas Starkey, Thomas Elyot, [End Page 312] Matthew Parker, Edmund Spenser, Robert Cotton, William Camden, John Weever, Francis Bacon, and Thomas James. These readings draw out the authors' views about the medieval past, the nature of libraries, the organization of knowledge, and much more. The result is a rich and sophisticated study that deals with a wide range of topics and ideas. It is exhaustively documented, with the notes making up more than a quarter of the text. This is a challenging book, which addresses a number of significant questions. Ultimately, though, the results are unsatisfactory, in several important ways. To start with the title: though the book begins and ends with the statement that 'memory is a library', and the 'Coda' contains some brief allusions to concepts of memory in cognitive science and computer science, the substance of the book is not really about memory. Where the concept of 'memory' does occur, it is used loosely to refer to a whole series of different types of 'remembering'. 'Memory as a library' tends to be used interchangeably with 'library as memory' - whereas, in reality, they are two very different things that ought to be carefully distinguished. In her Introduction, Summit draws a contrast between monastic libraries which upheld the authority of the Church of Rome and the major post-Reformation libraries which became 'centers of national memory' (p. 3). This is a surprisingly simplistic statement from an author who, on several occasions, emphasizes her commitment to a more 'nuanced' view of the relationship between the pre- and post-Reformation eras. It begs a whole series of questions about the nature and purposes of medieval libraries, let alone the nature of 'national memory' and the role of libraries in the modern world. At the very least, the statement needs to be explained and discussed more fully. Summit's assumptions about the nature and history of libraries tend to be over-simplified in other ways too. Medieval libraries and monastic libraries are referred to as if they were one and the same - even though cathedral, college, and school libraries (and even personal libraries) are referred to several times in passing. The extent and contents of post-Reformation libraries are never fully discussed, and the fact that they contained many more printed books than medieval manuscripts is largely glossed over. But this has significant implications for the survival of 'medieval books'. How did the manuscripts fit into the larger context of the post-Reformation library as a whole? Should the survival of medieval manuscripts be distinguished from the survival of medieval texts in printed form? Libraries were only one aspect of the various collecting activities of men like Cotton, as Summit acknowledges. How did their collections of 'curiosities' affect their approach to medieval manuscripts and their understanding of the meaning and significance of those manuscripts? [End Page 313] The methodology adopted for this book produces a series of admirably close and sensitive readings of specific texts. But this is achieved at some cost to the coherence of the overall argument. The themes in More's Utopia, Spenser's The Faerie Queene, Camden...
- Research Article
51
- 10.1353/scr.0.0040
- Mar 1, 2009
- South Central Review
Many scholars have argued that King Lear draws inspiration from the early modern sciences of anatomy and cartography, even as it critiques the modes of knowledge (violent and penetrative or rational and imperial) they represent. Taking its cue from the conflation of anatomical and cartographic tropes in Shakespeare’s play as well as in scholars’ accounts of it, this article tracks the material and ideological interaction of anatomical illustrations of the human body and representations of human figures on maps; it then reinterprets the play in light of that confluence. Rather than offering judgment on the efficacy or pretensions of science, the use of anatomy and cartography in King Lear participates in an emerging epistemology of human embodiment: a universalizing logic of the grid by which humans would be identified and differentiated, classified and compared. Read in relation to the play’s invocation of nature, Lear ’s creation of an abstract, representative human reveals a genealogy of the modern concepts of norms and the normal. Scholars have contended that the logic of normality first emerged in the Enlightenment and gained traction over the nineteenth century. From the prospect provided by Lear , we access a prehistory to the discourse of normality—one that shows the concepts of nature and norms interacting, not through shared prescriptions of bodily conduct, but through their common commitment to universalizing styles of reasoning. In addition to shedding light on the play and critics’ treatments of it, this genealogy of normality enables a reassessment of aesthetic appraisals of Shakespeare’s “greatest tragedy” as well as the critical controversy that long attended the play’s performance history. King Lear bequeaths to us the terms of abstract universal humanity—a discourse of normality infused with and bolstered by appeals to our common nature—by which we still judge the play, and each other.
- Single Book
3
- 10.5771/9780739175378
- Jan 1, 2015
Mapping and Charting for the Lion and the Lily: Map and Atlas Production in Early Modern England and France is a comparative study of the production and role of maps, charts, and atlases in early modern England and France, with a particular focus on Paris, the cartographic center of production from the late seventeenth century to the late eighteenth century, and London, which began to emerge (in the late eighteenth century) to eclipse the once favored Bourbon center. The themes that carry through the work address the role of government in map and chart making. In France, in particular, it is the importance of the centralized government and its support for geographic works and their makers through a broad and deep institutional infrastructure. Prior to the late eighteenth century in England, there was no central controlling agency or institution for map, chart, or atlas production, and any official power was imposed through the market rather than through the establishment of institutions. There was no centralized support for the cartographic enterprise and any effort by the crown was often challenged by the power of Parliament which saw little value in fostering or supporting scholar-geographers or a national survey. This book begins with an investigation of the imagery of power on map and atlas frontispieces from the late sixteenth century to the seventeenth century. In the succeeding chapters the focus moves from county and regional mapping efforts in England and France to the “paper wars” over encroachment in their respective colonial interests. The final study looks at charting efforts and highlights the role of government support and the commercial trade in the development of maritime charts not only for the home waters of the English Channel, but the distant and dangerous seas of the East Indies.
- Research Article
- 10.1086/680966
- Aug 1, 2015
- Modern Philology
<i>Shakespearean Sensations: Experiencing Literature in Early Modern England</i>. Edited by Katharine A. Craik and Tanya Pollard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. v+244.
- Single Book
8
- 10.4324/9781315606378
- Apr 8, 2016
Contents: Introduction: rhetorics of bodily disease and health in medieval and early modern England, Jennifer C. Vaught Part 1 Reading the Instructive Language of the Body in the Middle Ages: Episcopal anatomies of the early Middle Ages, Lisi Oliver and Maria Mahoney 'This disfigured people': representations of sin as pathological bodily and mental affliction in Dante's Inferno XXIXa XXX, James C. Nohrnberg 'My body to warentea |': linguistic corporeality in Chaucer's Pardoner, Laila Abdalla. Part 2 Imaginative Discourses of Sexuality, Delightful and Dangerous: Spenser's crowd of Cupids and the language of pleasure, William A. Oram Cordelia can't: rhetorics of reticence and (dis)ease in King Lear, Emma L.E. Rees. Part 3 Bodily Metaphors of Disease and Science in Renaissance England: Reckoning death: women searchers and the bills of mortality in early modern England, Richelle Munkhoff 'Revolving this will teach thee how to curse': a lesson in sublunary exhalation, Rebecca Totaro. Part 4 The Power of Linguistic Infection and Cure in Early Modern Literature and Medicine: Shakespeare and the irony of early modern disease metaphor and metonymy, William Spates Body of death: the Pauline inheritance in Donne's Sermons, Spenser's Maleger, and Milton's Sin and Death, Judith H. Anderson Subventing disease: anger, passions, and the non-naturals, Stephen Pender Selected bibliography Index.
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.