Abstract

The General V(λ) Mismatch Index, f1', was defined for a general description of the photometric performance of photometers. This index is widely-used in photometry, and it is very relevant for selecting photometers for low-uncertainty photometric measurements. It quantifies the spectral mismatch between the relative spectral responsivity of a photometer and the luminous efficiency function for photopic vision, V(λ). The linear correlation between the real general photometric measurement error and f1' of 77 photometers was studied for four sets of light sources: R, G and B LEDs (narrowband spectral power distributions, SPDs), blackbodies at different colour temperatures (broadband SPDs), phosphor-based LEDs at different correlated color temperatures (SPDs with narrow- and broad-band features), and a mixture of blackbodies and phosphor-based LED sources. This article shows that it can be defined an alternative index which is notably better correlated with the real general photometric measurement error of the photometers under light sources with broadband features in their SPDs, adequate for general lighting. This index is based on filtering the high spectral frequencies variations between the relative spectral responsivity of the photometer and V(λ). The use of this new index for the assessment of the general photometric performance of photometers would improve the selection of high quality photometers and, consequently, would contribute to the general improvement of photometric measurements.

Highlights

  • Illuminance and luminance meters, which will be indistinctly denoted as photometers in this text, are devices designed to measure optical radiation according to its action upon the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) standard photometric observer, whose relative spectral responsivity curve is conformed to the spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision, V(λ), defined in ISO 23539:2005(E)/CIE S010/E:2004 [1]

  • We propose here a new general photometric measurement error index ( f1 ) for broadband spectral power distribution (SPD) to be used in general lighting, which can be calculated without a well-established set of light sources

  • The linear correlation between the general photometric measurement error and the General V(λ) Mismatch Index, f1, of 77 photometers has been studied for four sets of light sources: RGB LEDs, blackbodies at different color temperatures, phosphor-based LEDs at different correlated color temperatures (SPDs with narrow- and broadband features), and a mixture of blackbodies and phosphor-based LED sources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Illuminance and luminance meters, which will be indistinctly denoted as photometers in this text, are devices designed to measure optical radiation according to its action upon the CIE standard photometric observer, whose relative spectral responsivity curve is conformed to the spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision, V(λ), defined in ISO 23539:2005(E)/CIE S010/E:2004 [1]. Different normalizations need to be used for different colors In this case, the problem is related with narrowband SPDs, and its origin is clear: an unrepresentative spectral mismatch at the narrow spectral range of emission of the LEDs. We have shown above that, for the narrowband SPDs of colored LEDs (light sources not relevant for general lighting) a mismatch index could be proposed which correlates better than f1 to the general photometric measurement error. We studied in detail the correlation between the photometric measurement error and f1 , and we found that it was possible to propose an alternative mismatch index for these LEDs, and for other light sources with exclusively broadband emission, as it is the case of blackbodies. We propose a new mismatch index that correlates considerably better with the mismatch-related photometric measurement errors of photometers under white light sources with broadband emission

Correlation between the general photometric measurement error and f1
Ph LED set
Proposal of a new general photometric measurement error index for photometers
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call