Abstract
Historical linguistics seeks not only to render plausible reconstructions of earlier stages of a language, but also to localize postulated developments within specific times and places. The Book of Daniel, along with Ezra, is of special interest for Aramaicists and Semiticists because about half of Daniel of the Hebrew Bible is written in Aramaic and hence it is one of the earliest extensive sources about Aramaic. The main sources Driver uses, besides the Biblical Aramaic (BA) of Daniel and Ezra are the Aramaic papyri from Egypt, dating from the early fifth century BCE. Garr (1985:26) gives a basis for the postulation of proto-Aramaic *ð even in the absence of graphemic evidence. Arabic is one of the few Semitic languages to have maintained proto- Semitic *ð> ð up to the present day. It has, however, not done so uniformly across all varieties. Keywords: Arabic; Aramaic; Book of Daniel; Egypt; Ezra; Hebrew Bible
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
