Abstract

BackgroundThe outcome of the 2016 presidential election is commonly attributed to socioeconomic and ethnic/racial issues, but health issues, including “deaths of despair,” may also have contributed.ObjectiveTo assess whether changes in age-adjusted death rates were independently associated with changes in presidential election voting in 2016 vs. 2008.DesignWe used publicly available data in each of 3112 US counties to correlate changes in a county’s presidential voting in 2016 compared with 2008 with recent changes in its age-adjusted death rate, after controlling for population and rural-urban status, median age, race/ethnicity, income, education, unemployment rate, and health insurance rate.Design SettingCross-sectional analysis of county-specific data.Setting/ParticipantsAll 3112 US counties.Main MeasuresThe independent correlation of a county’s change in age-adjusted death rate between 2000 and 2015 with its net percentage Republican gain or loss in the presidential election of 2016 vs. 2008.Key ResultsIn 2016, President Trump increased the Republican presidential vote percentage in 83.8% of counties compared with Senator McCain in 2008. Counties with an increased Republican vote percentage in 2016 vs. 2008 had a 15% higher 2015 age-adjusted death rate than counties with an increased Democratic vote percentage. Since 2000, overall death rates declined by less than half as much, and death rates from drugs, alcohol, and suicide increased 2.5 times as much in counties with Republican gains compared with counties with Democratic gains. In multivariable analyses, Republican net presidential gain in 2016 vs. 2008 was independently correlated with slower reductions in a county’s age-adjusted death rate. Although correlation cannot infer causality, modest reductions in death rates might theoretically have shifted Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin to Secretary Clinton.ConclusionsLess of a reduction in age-adjusted death rates was an independent correlate of an increased Republican percentage vote in 2016 vs. 2008. Death rates may be markers of dissatisfactions and fears that influenced the 2016 Presidential election outcomes.

Highlights

  • In 2016, President Trump achieved a surprising victory by winning the US electoral college despite losing the popular vote.[1]

  • To assess the comparative importance of recent health changes vs. recent changes in demographic and socioeconomic factors on the 2016 presidential election, our goal was to determine whether there was an independent correlation of county-specific changes in death rates[13, 14] with changes in voting, after adjusting for these other possible correlates

  • We created a continuous outcome defined as the Bnet Republican percentage gain,^ which was the sum of any improvement in the percentage of votes for President Trump in 2016 compared with Senator McCain in 2008 plus any decrement in the percentage of votes for Secretary Clinton in 2016 compared with President Obama in 2008

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2016, President Trump achieved a surprising victory by winning the US electoral college despite losing the popular vote.[1]. DESIGN: We used publicly available data in each of 3112 US counties to correlate changes in a county’s presidential voting in 2016 compared with 2008 with recent changes in its age-adjusted death rate, after controlling for population and rural-urban status, median age, race/ethnicity, income, education, unemployment rate, and health insurance rate. CONCLUSIONS: Less of a reduction in age-adjusted death rates was an independent correlate of an increased Republican percentage vote in 2016 vs 2008.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call