Independent Influence of Skin Temperature on Whole-Body Sweat Rate.

Abstract

It is often assumed that a person with a higher mean skin temperature (Tsk) will sweat more during exercise. However, it has not yet been demonstrated whether Tsk describes any individual variability in whole-body sweat rate (WBSR) independently of the evaporative requirement for heat balance (Ereq). One hundred forty bouts of 2-h treadmill walking completed by a pool of 21 participants (23 ± 4 yr, 174 ± 8 cm, 76 ± 11 kg, 1.9 ± 0.2 m) under up to nine conditions were analyzed. Trials employed varying rates of metabolic heat production (Hprod; 197-813 W), and environmental conditions (15°C, 20°C, 25°C, 30°C; all 50% relative humidity), yielding a wide range of Ereq (86-684 W) and Tsk values (26.9°C-34.4°C). The individual variation observed in WBSR was best described using Ereq (in watts; R = 0.784) as a sole descriptor, relative to Ereq (in watts per meter squared; R = 0.735), Hprod (in watts; R = 0.639), Hprod (in watts per meter squared; R = 0.584), ambient air temperature (Ta) (R = 0.263), and Tsk (R = 0.077; all, P < 0.001). A multiple stepwise linear regression included only Ereq (in watts; adjusted R = 0.784), with Tsk not significantly correlating with the residual variance (P = 0.285), independently of Ereq (in watts). Hprod (in watts) had similar predictive strength to Ereq (in watts) at a fixed air temperature, explaining only 5.2% at 30°C, 4.9% at 25°C, 2.7% at 20°C, and 0.5% at 15°C (all, P < 0.001) less variance in WBSR compared with Ereq. However, when data from all ambient temperatures were pooled, Hprod alone was a markedly worse predictor of WBSR than Ereq (R = 0.639 vs 0.784; P < 0.001). Ereq (in watts) explained approximately four-fifths of the individual variation in WBSR over a range of ambient temperatures and exercise intensities, whereas Tsk did not explain any residual variance independently of Ereq.