Abstract

Introduction: The crowding of emergency departments (ED) has been a growing problem for years, putting the care of critically ill patients increasingly at risk. The INDEED project's overall aim is to get a better understanding of ED utilization and to evaluate corresponding primary health care use patterns before and after an ED visit while driving forward processes and methods of cross-sectoral data merging. We aim to identify adequate utilization of EDs and potentially avoidable patient contacts as well as subgroups and clusters of patients with similar care profiles.Methods: INDEED is a joint endeavor bringing together research institutions and hospitals with EDs in Germany. It is headed by the Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, collaborating with Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Technische Universität Berlin, the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory/Outpatient Health Care in Germany (Zi), and the AOK Research Institute as part of the Federal Association of AOK, as well as experts in the technological, legal, and regulatory aspects of medical research (TMF). The Institute for Information Technology (OFFIS) was involved as the trusted third party of the project. INDEED is a retrospective study of approximately 400,000 adult patients with statutory health insurance who visited the ED of one of 16 participating hospitals in 2016. The routine hospital data contain information about treatment in the ED and, if applicable, about the subsequent hospital stay. After merging the patients' hospital data from 2016 with their outpatient billing data from 2 years before to 1 year after the ED visit (years 2014–2017), a harmonized dataset will be generated for data analyses. Due to the complex data protection challenges involved, first results will be available in 2021.Discussion: INDEED will provide knowledge on extracting and harmonizing large scale data from varying routine ED and hospital information systems in Germany. Merging these data with the corresponding outpatient care data of patients offers the opportunity to characterize the patient's treatment in outpatient care before and after ED use. With this knowledge, appropriate interventions may be developed to ensure adequate patient care and to avoid adverse events such as ED crowding.

Highlights

  • The crowding of emergency departments (ED) has been a growing problem for years, putting the care of critically ill patients increasingly at risk

  • Is designed as a retrospective evaluation of three different scenarios based on different data sources (Figure 1), with the aim of illustrating ED use in 2016

  • The main research question focuses on scenario 1, comprising selected routinely collected data on emergency treatment and possible subsequent hospital stay from 16 EDs, merged with the data of these patients from their routine outpatient health care for the period from 2 years before to 1 year after their ED stay [15, 16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The crowding of emergency departments (ED) has been a growing problem for years, putting the care of critically ill patients increasingly at risk. Emergency departments (EDs) in many countries face the challenge of crowding and increasing numbers of ED visits [1]. From 2009 to 2015 the number of patients in EDs increased by 42% for outpatient care while inpatient emergency cases grew by 20% [4]. One reason for the rising ED patient numbers in outpatient treatment is the utilization of the EDs’ 24/7 available medical expertise for minor health problems. This is due to several reasons, with patients often citing health anxiety and lack of alternatives [5,6,7]. A large share of acute care patients receiving inpatient treatment after an ED visit are diagnosed with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC), i.e., frequent chronic and acute diagnoses for which inpatient care could have

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call