Abstract

To the Editor. —The case report by Sponsel and Rapoza, 1 published in the April 1992 issue of theArchives, deserves critical comment in spite of an apparent imprimatur from the National Registry of Drug-Induced Ocular Side Effects. The words associated, association , and indapamide-associated appear in this report in reference to the posterior subcapsular cataracts found in this patient who had been treated indapamide (Lozol). Although the authors may not have intended this implication, these words do carry for many the nuance of causal relationship. This specific case report in no way permits the conclusion that reasonable medical there was a causal relationship between the patient's having been treated indapamide and the subsequent detection of cataracts. It appears possible... is not appropriate in a report that has not only medical significance but also, unfortunately, legal potentialities. Probable cause or with reasonable medical certainty should be used

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.