Abstract

Maintenance hemodialysis is typically prescribed thrice weekly irrespective of a patient's residual kidney function (RKF). We hypothesized that a less frequent schedule at hemodialysis therapy initiation is associated with greater preservation of RKF without compromising survival among patients with substantial RKF. A longitudinal cohort. 23,645 patients who initiated maintenance hemodialysis therapy in a large dialysis organization in the United States (January 2007 to December 2010), had available RKF data during the first 91 days (or quarter) of dialysis, and survived the first year. Incremental (routine twice weekly for >6 continuous weeks during the first 91 days upon transition to dialysis) versus conventional (thrice weekly) hemodialysis regimens during the same time. Changes in renal urea clearance and urine volume during 1 year after the first quarter and survival after the first year. Among 23,645 included patients, 51% had substantial renal urea clearance (≥3.0mL/min/1.73m(2)) at baseline. Compared with 8,068 patients with conventional hemodialysis regimens matched based on baseline renal urea clearance, urine volume, age, sex, diabetes, and central venous catheter use, 351 patients with incremental regimens exhibited 16% (95% CI, 5%-28%) and 15% (95% CI, 2%-30%) more preserved renal urea clearance and urine volume at the second quarter, respectively, which persisted across the following quarters. Incremental regimens showed higher mortality risk in patients with inadequate baseline renal urea clearance (≤3.0mL/min/1.73m(2); HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.44), but not in those with higher baseline renal urea clearance (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76-1.28). Results were similar in a subgroup defined by baseline urine volume of 600mL/d. Potential selection bias and wide CIs. Among incident hemodialysis patients with substantial RKF, incremental hemodialysis may be a safe treatment regimen and is associated with greater preservation of RKF, whereas higher mortality is observed after the first year of dialysis in those with the lowest RKF. Clinical trials are needed to examine the safety and effectiveness of twice-weekly hemodialysis.

Highlights

  • Maintenance hemodialysis is typically prescribed thrice weekly irrespective of a patient’s residual kidney function (RKF)

  • Median renal urea clearance and urine volume were 3.04 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 800 mL/d (IQR, 500-1,300) at baseline, respectively, and the prevalence of patients with baseline renal urea clearance .3.0 mL/min/1.73 m21 was 51%

  • Baseline renal urea clearance and urine volume were higher in 351 patients who initiated hemodialysis treatment with a twice-weekly schedule in the first patient-quarter compared with the 23,294 other patients (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Background

Maintenance hemodialysis is typically prescribed thrice weekly irrespective of a patient’s residual kidney function (RKF). Less frequent hemodialysis has been commonly prescribed in countries such as China and India,[18,19,20] and its combination with low-protein diet has been suggested for select patients on transition to dialysis therapy.[21,22] The NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation2Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) guidelines suggested a twice-weekly schedule for patients with “substantial residual renal urea clearance” (ie, $3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 2006.1 most patients initiating maintenance hemodialysis therapy in the United States are prescribed thrice-weekly treatments irrespective of RKF.

METHODS
Statistical Methods
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.