Abstract

Previous investigations document functional and phylogenetic signals in the histology of dinosaur teeth. In particular, incremental lines in dentin have been used to determine tooth growth and replacement rates in several dinosaurian clades. However, to date, few studies have investigated the dental microstructure of theropods in the omnivory/herbivory spectrum. Here we examine dental histology of Therizinosauria, a clade of large-bodied theropods bearing significant morphological evidence for herbivory, by examining the teeth of the early-diverging therizinosaurian Falcarius utahensis, and an isolated tooth referred to Suzhousaurus megatherioides, a highly specialized large-bodied representative. Despite attaining some of the largest body masses among maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs, therizinosaurian teeth are diminutive, measuring no more than 0.90 cm in crown height (CH) and 0.38 cm in crown base length (CBL). Comparisons with other theropods and non-theropodan herbivorous dinosaurs reveals that when controlling for estimated body mass, crown volume in therizinosaurians plots most closely with dinosaurs of similar dietary strategy as opposed to phylogenetic heritage. Analysis of incremental growth lines in dentin, observed in thin sections of therizinosaurian teeth, demonstrates that tooth growth rates fall within the range of other archosaurs, conforming to hypothesized physiological limitations on the production of dental tissues. Despite dietary differences between therizinosaurians and hypercarnivorous theropods, the types of enamel crystallites present and their spatial distribution—i.e., the schmelzmuster of both taxa—is limited to parallel enamel crystallites, the simplest form of enamel and the plesiomorphic condition for Theropoda. This finding supports previous hypotheses that dental microstructure is strongly influenced by phylogeny, yet equally supports suggestions of reduced reliance on oral processing in omnivorous/herbivorous theropods rather than the microstructural specializations to diet exhibited by non-theropodan herbivorous dinosaurs. Finally, although our sample is limited, we document a significant reduction in the rate of enamel apposition contrasted with increased relative enamel thickness between early and later diverging therizinosaurians that coincides with anatomical evidence for increased specializations to herbivory in the clade.

Highlights

  • Previous research has identified functional and phylogenetic signals in the dental microstructure of many extant and extinct amniotes (Johnston, 1979)

  • Therizinosaurians, which are widely regarded to fall within the omnivory/herbivory spectrum (Barrett, 2005; Zanno et al, 2009), show the same parallel crystallite enamel found in hypercarnivorous dromaeosaurids and we observe no strong dietary signal amongst those maniraptorans whose dental histology has been categorized (Stokosa, 2005; Zanno & Makovicky, 2011; Hwang, 2011) and can reject the hypothesis that dietary differences in Therizinosauria are evident in enamel microstructure

  • The slightly divergent parallel enamel of the late-diverging non-therizinosaurid therizinosauroid S. megatherioides may reflect more orderly enamel production, and potentially increasing functional specializations bridging the simplistic teeth of F. utahensis and the specialized teeth and higher bite force simulations of the therizinosaurid S. galbinensis; we caution against ascribing too much significance to a potential increase in enamel organization coinciding with increasing skeletal adaptations for herbivory in the clade given the dearth of microstructure data currently available

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous research has identified functional and phylogenetic signals in the dental microstructure of many extant and extinct amniotes (Johnston, 1979). Counting the number of VELs and measuring the average increment widths has yielded calculations of tooth growth and replacement rates in fossil hominids (Dean, 2006), dinosaurs (Erickson, 1996b; Sereno et al, 2007; D’Emic et al, 2013; García & Zurriaguz, 2016; Erickson et al, 2017), and other extinct taxa (Scheyer & Moser, 2011; Heckert & Miller-Camp, 2013). Previous work documents that they are a biologically meaningful indicator of incremental growth of dental tissues (Appenzeller et al, 2005)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call